Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

CASE REPORT
4 (
1
); 56-57
doi:
10.4103/0974-2077.79197

Intra-natal Torsion of Polydactyly

Department of Plastic Surgery, NMC Specialty Hospital, Dubai, UAE

Address for correspondence: Dr. Sanjay Saraf, Department of Plastic Surgery, NMC Specialty Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates E-mail: drsaraf@hotmail.com

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Post-axial polydactyly is a common congenital hand anomaly with a wide range of manifestations. We report here an unusual case of intra-natal torsion of duplicated small finger which presented as gangrene at birth.

Keywords

Polydactyly
polydactyly gangrene
polydactyly torsion
post-axial

INTRODUCTION

The duplication of the little finger is one of the most frequent congenital malformations of the hand. The extent of duplication varies from a soft tissue nubbin to a completely developed digit. The presented case probably represents the first reported case of intra-natal torsion of post-axial polydactyly presenting as gangrene at birth, as an extensive review of the literature and Pubmed search did not reveal a similar published case.

CASE REPORT

A male child presented with gangrene of the accessory digit of the left hand at birth [Figure 1]. The child’s weight was 6.25 kg and was delivered full term by Caesarean section. There was no similar or other obvious visible anomaly. There was no sibling or family history of any hand/feet or other congenital anomalies. The child was evaluated by a neonatologist and no associated cardiovascular, gastrointestinal or genitourinary system anomaly was found. The ultrasonography of abdomen was normal. The antenatal history was not significant in relation to exposure to viral infection, drugs, alcohol, or radiation in the first trimester. On examination, there was a gangrene of twisted pedunculated accessory digit of left little finger [Figure 2]. The gangrenous digit was excised from the base under local anaesthesia with satisfactory outcome [Figure 3].

Torsion of polydactyly
Figure 1
Torsion of polydactyly
Torsion of polydactyly
Figure 2
Torsion of polydactyly
After excision
Figure 3
After excision

Discussion

Post-axial polydactyly constitutes one of the most frequent congenital malformations of the hand and is thought to be the result of an excess longitudinal segmentation representing probably an increased folding of the apical ectodermal ridge. The true incidence of post-axial polydactyly is difficult to determine as many of them are removed by the obstetricians and paediatricians in the nursery. Post-axial polydactyly occurs in approximately 1 in 300 black births and 1 in 3000 in Caucasians and is more frequently seen in male children.[12]

The spectrum of the deformity in post-axial polydactyly ranges from a simple soft-tissue problem to a complex completely developed accessory ray. Post-axial polydactyly has been classified into three types based on the degree of duplication.[3] Type I is duplication of soft parts only; Type II is partial duplication of the digit, including the osseous structures; and Type III is complete duplication of the digit, including the metacarpal, but is rare.

The torsion of pedunculated accessory digit is sometimes seen in Type I duplication, however, intra-natal torsion of post-axial polydactyly has not been previously reported in the literature to the best of our knowledge. The intra-natal torsion of visceral or parietal organs per se is very rare. An extensive search of the literature in Pubmed revealed only one case of intra-natal torsion of a testicular tumour.[4]

Post-axial polydactyly is believed to be genetically determined. The Type I pattern is dominant and multifactorial and involves two genes with incomplete penetrance. Type II and III are inherited as dominant traits with marked penetrance.[5] The black children usually present with autosomal dominant transmission with no other anomalies, while in Caucasians the transmission is autosomal recessive with frequent syndromic association.[5] The syndromes known to be associated with post-axial polydactyly are chromosomal syndromes (trisomy 13,18), bony dysplasias (Ellis van creveld syndrome, Achrondroplasia), syndromes involving eyes (Laurence moon biedl), syndromes involving skin (Goltz, Bloom), orofacial syndromes (cleft lip, Meckel) and syndromes with mental retardation (Cornelia de Lange, Smith-Lemli-Opitz).[6]

Post-axial polydactyly requires detailed clinical, syndromic and imaging evaluation prior to the treatment. The treatment modalities vary from simple excision to complex skeletal surgeries depending upon the type. For Type I deformities, early excision followed by primary closure and occasionally z-plasty closure (if the skin incision is in a palmar location) under local anaesthesia is the preferred treatment.[56] The use of only ligature around the base is not recommended because of reports of fatal haemorrhage.[57] The suture ligation at the base of the pedicle often leaves small nubbins with retained cartilage which later grow requiring subsequent removal.[6] The pedicle should be incised and the neurovascular pedicle should be cauterized or ligated directly.[8] The torsion of the pedunculated accessory digit invariably leads to pain, infection and occasionally significant bleeding. They should be considered as surgical emergency and should be excised immediately. The management of Type II and Type III is more complex and it is preferable to wait for at least two to three years as by this time the anaesthesia risks recede, the hand is larger and technically surgery is easier to perform. In Type III, more functional digit should be retained combined with the parts of the ablated partner, with placement in a more satisfactory position.[9]

Source of Support: Nil

Conflict of Interest: None declared

REFERENCES

  1. , , . Polydactyly in American negroes and whites. Am J Hum Genet. 1973;25:397-404.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Polydactyly as an isolated malformation. Birth Defect. 1978;14:364-92.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . Synopsis of hand malformations with particular emphasis upon genetic factors. Birth Defect. 1969;3:125-84.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . Intrauterine torsion of a testicular teratoma: A case report. J Perinatol. 2005;25:220-2.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Cong anomalies of hand. In: , ed. Campbell’s operative orthopaedics (9th ed). St.Louis: Missouri, Mosby; . p. :3791-2.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , . Congenital anomalies of the hand and forearm. (1st ed). Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; . p. :5352-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , . Extra fingers. In: The care of congenital hand anomalies (2 nd ed). St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing; . p. :292-16.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Polydactyly. In: Pediatric orthopedics (2nd ed). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; . p. :240-57.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , . Congenital deformities of the hand and forearm. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; .
    [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
199

PDF downloads
238
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections