Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

LETTERS
4 (
2
); 160-160
doi:
10.4103/0974-2077.85052

CROSS Technique with Full Strength TCA in the Management of Ice Pick Acne Scars

Department of Dermatology, Carolena Skin, Laser and Research Centre, Jalandhar, Punjab, India. E-mail:
Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Sir,

I read with interest the manuscript on treatment of ice pick acne scars by Bhardwaj and Khunger, May- August issue of JCAS.[1]

CROSS technique is no doubt a very easy, economical and efficient technique for treatment of atrophic ice pitted acne scars.[2] The article misses some vital information. In the methods section, it is mentioned that the scars were counted in each patient which means an objective evaluation of scars was also done in the study besides subjective evaluation by the investigator. However, which scoring system for scars was used is not mentioned.[34] It would be worthwhile to mention how the objective assessment in the improvement of scarring was noted. If not, then what is the purpose of counting scars? It should be recorded.

In the observation table, where 80 percent patients have been shown to have excellent improvement, it should have been mentioned that how much reduction in number of scars (count) defined excellent improvement as scars were initially counted. Secondly, the assessment in table is a representation of results seen at end of four sessions only. The tables including assessment at end of 3 and 6 months would have given a better idea of how persistent the results were in the study as it is not the immediate but long term results which matter. Thirdly, it is mentioned that a statistical package of SPSSIO version was used for analysis. It is however not mentioned how the analysis was interpreted through SPSSIO version in the study.

In the figures, there is no pre and post treatment picture to show excellent improvement. The figures start with the frosting step. The initial picture of the patient before application of TCA should have been included which is very vital for comparison. It is difficult to appreciate if Figure 2 and 3 are of same patient, as Figure 2 is a close picture while Figure 3, a far distance picture with complete side view of face. There is significant difference in photographic angle and color of picture for comparison. Another fallacy is in the abstract which mentions that transient hyperpigmentation was noted in one patient but in results it is not mentioned which patient developed transient hyperpigmentation. Did it belong to 80 percent group showing excellent improvement? It would be interesting to know if the patient was Fitzpatrick IV or V, as darker skin types run more risk of transient hyperpigmentation. CROSS technique would be very useful in Indian setup if long term results are equally impressive.

REFERENCES

  1. , , . Assessment of the efficacy and safety of CROSS technique with 100% TCA in the management of ice pick acne scars. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2010;3:93-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , . CROSS technique: Chemical reconstruction of skin scars method. Dermatol Ther. 2008;21:S29-32.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . A clinical evaluation of acne scarring and its incidence. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1994;19:303-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . Development and validation of a scale for acne scar severity (SCAR-S) of the face and trunk. J Cutan Med Surg. 2010;14:156-60.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    170

    PDF downloads
    148
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections