Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

CORRESPONDENCE
7 (
2
); 136-137
doi:
10.4103/0974-2077.138368

Re: Superficial Large Basal Cell Carcinoma Over Face, Reconstructed by V-Y Plasty

The Dermatology Cente, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Stott Lane, Salford, M6 8HD, United Kingdom E-mail:
Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Dear Editor,

Deshmukh et al. published a case of ‘Superficial large basal cell carcinoma over face, reconstructed by V-Y plasty’.[1] Whilst I congratulate the authors for publishing their experience, I must highlight some inaccuracies and omissions in this article.

The authors state that superficial basal cell carcinomas (sBCC) are uncommon on the face. I agree with this statement but disagree with their clinical and histological assessment of the reported BCC on the face, which appears clinically morphoeic and histologically infiltrative.

The readership may take home the wrong message that excision followed by flap repair should be a good option for sBCC. This would be an inaccurate inference as excellent tissue salvaging technologies exist for treatment of sBCC.[2]

Further, whilst surgical excision with predetermined margins is a standard treatment of the BCC in the report, the authors fail to mention the role of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) in this context. It should be highlighted that MMS is the gold standard treatment for large and infiltrative tumours such as the one in the reported patient. The cost of setting up a Mohs unit along with the need for specialist training limit the availability of this treatment, which makes excision with predetermined margins an acceptable second best option.

The most important aspect in skin cancer surgery is histological cure, but the authors failed to mention the margins of clearance or involvement in the excised specimen. A recurrent BCC on a skin flap is often more challenging to treat than a primary lesion.

Finally, we should restrict the description ‘superficial spreading’ to the most common melanoma subtype; superficial BCCs rarely spread.

REFERENCES

  1. , , , , . Superficial large basal cell carcinoma over face, reconstructed by V-Y plasty. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2014;7:65-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . Non-melanoma skin cancer. Lancet. 2010;375:673-85.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    112

    PDF downloads
    40
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections