Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

CORRESPONDENCE
8 (
1
); 67-68
doi:
10.4103/0974-2077.155096

Giant Scrotal Lymphoedema

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Research Center, Department of Vascular Surgery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
Department of General Surgery, Trauma Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran E-mail:
Department of Pathology, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Dear Editor,

Massive scrotal lymphoedema or scrotal elephantiasis is an uncommon condition in a temperate climate, causing severe physical limitations and anxiety to patients, leading to disability.[12] It can happen at any age in persons, especially those living in the endemic zones of filaria.[3] Most of the time medical therapy is not effective enough and surgical excision of the involved tissues is performed to treat this unpleasant condition.[4] In this article, we discuss a patient suffering from giant scrotal lymphoedema, who underwent surgical resection.

A 47-year-old man was referred to our centre for gradual enlargement of the scrotum since seven years. Physical examination revealed giant scrotal lymphoedema also involving the right lower extremity with lymphoedema. His penis and both testicles were not palpable and urination was possible through a pit on the scrotum [Figure 1]. The patient had a history of scrotal vesicular lesions in the past, but on physical examination no vesicular lesion was visible. He had no history of travelling to endemic regions with filariasis. No mass or lymphadenopathy was found in the groins, and also, the patient had no history of trauma, radiation or drug injection in his groins. An abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan was normal and blood investigations for filariasis were negative. The patient underwent surgical resection of all the involved tissues weighing about 9 kg [Figure 2]. Fortunately the penile shaft and both the testicles were normal [Figure 3] and the final reconstruction was done in a Y-shaped manner, with the root of the penis in the centre [Figure 4]. Histopathologic evaluation revealed extensive fibrosis in the resected specimen, with no sarcomatous changes noted [Figure 5], and patient had an uneventful post-operative course [Figure 6].

Giant scrotal lymphoedema
Figure 1
Giant scrotal lymphoedema
Removed specimen
Figure 2
Removed specimen
Penis and both testicles were intact after resection
Figure 3
Penis and both testicles were intact after resection
Final result after reconstruction
Figure 4
Final result after reconstruction
(a) Spindle myofibroblastic cells spreading between the scrotal muscle fibers and separating them (H and E) (b) Irregular fascicles of the proliferated bland myofibroblastic cells (H and E) (c) Trichrome staining shows abundant stromal collagen (blue fibers) (d) Immunohistochemical staining and Trichrome staining show positive reactivity of the lesional cells with betacatnin
Figure 5
(a) Spindle myofibroblastic cells spreading between the scrotal muscle fibers and separating them (H and E) (b) Irregular fascicles of the proliferated bland myofibroblastic cells (H and E) (c) Trichrome staining shows abundant stromal collagen (blue fibers) (d) Immunohistochemical staining and Trichrome staining show positive reactivity of the lesional cells with betacatnin
Post-operative appearance after one year
Figure 6
Post-operative appearance after one year

Any disturbance of the normal lymphatic drainage from the external genitalia, such as, an obstruction or defect in the formation of lymphatic vessels, results in lymphoedema of the scrotum.[56] Dilated lymphatic vessels are seen because of this obstruction. The etiology may be congenital and acquired. The most common acquired aetiology is infection by Wuchereria bancrofti or Chlamydia trachomatis with the other etiologies being radiation, venous thrombosis, malignancy, inflammation, trauma, surgical intervention, drug injections, and so on.[78] At first, the oedema is painless, pitting, and rich in protein, causing features of elephantiasis. Later, fibrosis occurs, making the scrotal skin coarse and indurated.[15] Urogenital manifestations, such as, urinary incontinence and loss of libido, besides recurrent cellulitis, may occur.[9] The treatment approach is based on the aetiology of the oedema. For example, antibiotics and anti-parasite drugs can cure the early stages of the disease caused by infection. However, in advanced disease the mainstay of treatment remains surgery.[10] In our case, on account of lack of other risk factors, the probable aetiology was filariasis, however, we were unable to prove it. There are two types of surgeries. Lymphangioplasty (in the presence of good lymphatic channels), which is performed to restore the drainage of the lymph, and the second, lymphangiectomy, which is excision of all the affected skin and subcutaneous tissue that is a superficial lymphatic network above the Buck`s fascia. Following this, reconstruction of the region of the genitalia by local tissue flaps, such as, the skin of the posterior scrotum (medial thigh flap if scrotal flap is not possible) or skin grafts (not recommended because of altered thermal regulation of testes) is performed.[111] Cosmetic issues must be considered beside preservation of the penis, testes, and spermatic cords, as also resumption of the proper function.[12] The complications of giant scrotal lymphoedema surgery include hemorrhage, hematoma, iatrogenic injury to the urethra, infection, painful erection, decreased sensation, and also recurrence.[1213]

REFERENCES

  1. , , , . Elephantiasis of the penis and scrotum: A review of 350 cases. Am J Surg. 1985;149:686-90.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . Scrotal and penile lymphoedema: Surgical considerations and management. J Urol. 1983;130:263-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , . Lymphoedema of the external genitalia. J Urol. 2003;170:711-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , . Overview of treatments for male genital lymphoedema: Critical literature review and anatomical considerations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:767e-9e.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , . Extensive genital elephantiasis: A case report. Rural Surg. 2000;5:17.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , . Idiopathic scrotal elephantiasis. Urology. 2005;65:389.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , . Giant scrotal elephantiasis of idiopathic aetiology. JARBS. 2011;3:106-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , . Giant scrotal elephantiasis of inflammatory aetiology: A case report. J Med Case Rep. 2007;1:23.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . Localized lymphoedema (elephantiasis): A case series and review of the literature. J Cutan Pathol. 2009;36:1-20.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , . Giant scrotal elephantiasis. Urology. 2005;65:389.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , . Giant scrotal elephantiasis with unknown aetiology. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;54:685-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . Reconstruction of penile and scrotal lymphoedema. Ann Plast Surg. 1991;27:570-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , . Giant scrotal lymphoedema: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2012;3:269-71.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    139

    PDF downloads
    72
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections