Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Case Report
10 (
4
); 219-222
doi:
10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_50_17

Lip Repositioning: A Boon in Smile Enhancement

Department of Periodontology, Subharti Dental College and Hospital, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India

Address for correspondence: Dr. Anamika Sharma, D-40 Meenakshi Puram, Mawana road, Meerut, India. E-mail: prof_anamika@hotmail.com

Licence

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

This clinical report describes the successful use of lip repositioning technique for the reduction of excessive gingival display. The lip repositioning technique was performed with the main objective of reducing gummy smile by limiting the retraction of elevator muscles (e.g., zygomaticus minor, levator anguli, orbicularis oris, and levator labii superioris). This technique includes removing a strip of mucosa from the maxillary buccal vestibule, creating a partial-thickness flap between mucogingival junction and upper lip musculature, and suturing the lip mucosa with mucogingival junction, resulting in a narrow vestibule and restricted muscle pull, thereby reducing gingival display.

Keywords

Elevator muscles
gingival display
gummy smile
mucogingival junction

BACKGROUND

Currently, a growing concern for beauty and physical appearance has motivated the clinician to evaluate the essentials of patient’s smile and consider the dynamic relationship between the dentition, gingivae, and lips while smiling, with greater demands regarding esthetic dentistry.[1] Management of gingival and skeletal deformities is most challenging and of esthetic concern to the patient in day-to-day life. With the advent of modern cosmetic dentistry, new materials, and techniques, it is possible to achieve the desired esthetic outcome. A beautiful smile comprises three components, i.e., lip, teeth, and gingiva, all of which should be in harmony with each other.[2]

A pleasant smile usually depends on the extent of gingival exposure, the upper and lower lip line, gingival health, correct anatomy, and teeth proportion. The normal gingival display is between inferior border of upper lip and gingival margin of anterior central incisors during smile, which accounts for the entire crown of maxillary central incisors and 1 mm of pink attached gingiva.[3]

An exposed gingiva of 2–3 mm is cosmetically acceptable; however, more than this is considered to be unattractive and commonly known as “gummy smile.”[4]

Various surgical modalities have been documented to eliminate the excessive gingival display including gingivectomy, flap surgery with osseous contouring, apically displaced flaps, myectomies, use of alloplastic or autogenous separators, and orthodontic therapy.[5]

The present report aims to demonstrate the use of a less invasive surgical procedure for the management of excessive gingival display, i.e., the lip repositioning technique by conventional method.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 32-year-old woman reported to the Department of Periodontology with the chief complaint of excessive gingival display during smile [Figure 1]. The patient’s medical history was noncontributory with no contraindication for surgery. Clinical examination revealed a good amount of attached gingiva and the patient was diagnosed with a case of “gummy smile.” However, when the patient was asked to smile, her teeth were visible from maxillary right first premolar to maxillary left first premolar molar with 8–9 mm gingival display. Maxillary anterior teeth had normal crown height and width/length ratio. Lip repositioning as a treatment option was discussed with the patient and a written informed consent was obtained prior to the procedure.

Preoperative photograph
Figure 1
Preoperative photograph

CASE MANAGEMENT

Adequate local infiltration was administered in the buccal vestibule between the first maxillary premolars. The incision outline was marked with an indelible pencil on the dried tissue using mucogingival junction and base of the vestibule as reference lines connected at mesial line angles of the right and left maxillary premolars to create an elliptical outline[6] as shown in Figure 2. A partial thickness incision was made between these two lines, and epithelial band approximately 10–12 mm wide was excised leaving underlying connective tissue exposed [Figures 35].[7]

Surgical outline marked with the help of an indelible pencil
Figure 2
Surgical outline marked with the help of an indelible pencil
Partial thickness flap elevated
Figure 3
Partial thickness flap elevated
Connective tissue exposed
Figure 4
Connective tissue exposed
Excised epithelium
Figure 5
Excised epithelium

The mucosal flap was then advanced and sutured with interrupted stabilization sutures at the midline and other locations along the borders of the incision mucogingival junction using 5-0 Vicryl sutures first at the midline [Figure 6] and then complete suturing was performed [Figure 7]. No periodontal dressing was placed. Postoperative instructions included soft diet, limited facial movements, no brushing around the surgical site for 14 days, and placing ice packs over the upper lip. The patient was instructed to rinse gently with 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate twice daily for 2 weeks. Postoperative amoxicillin 500 mg three times a day (TDS) and ibuprofen 400 mg twice a day (BD) for 5 days were prescribed.

Interrupted sutures placed at midline
Figure 6
Interrupted sutures placed at midline
Sutures placed bilaterally
Figure 7
Sutures placed bilaterally

CLINICAL OUTCOME

Uneventful postoperative healing occurred and the patient reported minimal postoperative bruising, or extraoral swelling, and slight pain when smiling 1-week after surgery. Sutures were removed after 2 weeks, and a significant reduction in the amount of gingival display at the 1-month follow-up visit was seen, which was stable along with competent lips [Figure 8].

One-month postoperative photograph
Figure 8
One-month postoperative photograph

DISCUSSION

Lip repositioning was first described in the literature of plastic surgery in 1973 by Rubinstein and Kostianovsky,[8] which was advocated again by Litton and Fournier[9] for correction of excessive gingival display in the presence of short upper lip.

Excessive gingival display, referred to as a “gummy smile,” can be a source of embarrassment for some patients. Delayed eruption and tooth malpositioning can be predictably treated with respective surgery and orthodontics; orthognathic surgery can also be performed. The case presented here entails surgical technique to reduce gingival display.

In most patients, the lower edge of the upper lip assumes a “gum-wing” profile, which limits the amount of gingiva that is exposed when a person smiles. Patients who have a high lip line expose a broad zone of gingival tissue and may often express concern about their “gummy smile.”

Therefore, the earlier-mentioned procedure is safe with minimal side effects as the patient did not complain of any postoperative complication.

By contrast, the use of botulinum toxin represents a simple, fast, and effective method for the esthetic correction of a gummy smile; however, the results obtained by this nonsurgical approach remain questionable. Surgical intervention by lip repositioning stands as a permanent means of treating a gummy smile.

Silva et al. in 2012 reported successful management of excessive gingival display using a modified lip repositioning technique. Treatment comprised removal of two strips of mucosa, bilaterally to the maxillary labial frenum, and coronal repositioning of the new mucosal margin. Most of the subjects showed satisfied results in their smile after the surgery.[10]

Ideally, the smile should expose minimal gingiva, the gingival contour should be symmetrical and in harmony with the upper lip, the anterior segment should be in harmony with the posterior segment, and the teeth should have a normal anatomy.[2]

CONCLUSION

Surgical lip repositioning is an effective procedure to reduce gingival display by positioning the upper lip in a more coronal direction. This technique holds promise as an alternative treatment modality in esthetic rehabilitation.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

None.

REFERENCES

  1. , . Psychological aspects of dentofacial esthetics and orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthodontist. 1983;54:18-35.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . Eliminating a gummy smile with surgical lip repositioning. J Cosmet Dent. 2007;23:100-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Use of modified lip repositioning technique associated with esthetic crown lengthening for treatment of excessive gingival display: a case report of multiple etiologies. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2016;20:82-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . Excessive gingival display: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment modalities. Quintessence Int. 2009;40:809-18.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . An innovative cosmetic technique called lip repositioning. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2010;14:266-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , . Lip repositioning: an alternative cosmetic treatment for gummy smile. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2014;18:520-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , . Lip repositioning. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2014;18:254-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . Cirugia astetica de la malformacion de la sonrisa. Pren Med Argent. 1973;60:952.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , . Simple surgical correction of the gummy smile. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;63:372-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , . The improvement of the gummy smile using the implant spacer technique. Ann Plast Surg. 1984;12:16-24.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections