Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Innovations
13 (
3
); 255-256
doi:
10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_191_19

Shave Biopsy Instrument: An Ergonomic Modification of Razor Blade

Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology, Government Medical College, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India

Address for correspondence: Dr. Sabha Mushtaq, Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology, Government Medical College, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, 180001, India. E-mail: smqazi.gmc@gmail.com

Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Abstract

The razor blade has been used by dermatologists as an alternative tool for performing shave excision and biopsy owing to its superior sharpness and flexibility. It is inexpensive and freely available but the bare blade design carries the risk of accidental injury to the operator and patient. We describe an easy modification of the razor blade for better grip, control, and safety in obtaining cutaneous shave specimens.

Keywords

DermaBlade®
innovation
razor blade
shave biopsy
shave biopsy instrument
surgical pearl

Shave excision is a simple and easy procedure usually performed using a scalpel with no. 15 blade. It can also be performed using a razor blade, which is very sharp and provides flexibility to the surgeon.[1] However, a razor blade is difficult to handle and maneuver with bare or gloved hands and carries the risk of accidental injury due to poor grip and inadvertent springing. The razor blade can also be broken to half but due to reduced strength, it is more prone to breakage. Also the practice of using half razor blade has resulted in cutting injuries and is therefore discouraged.[2] Several modifications of the razor blade have been devised to overcome its one or more disadvantages. Harvey and Fenske[3] introduced an adapter-designed version of the razor blade wherein the blade is embedded in a flexible polypropylene plastic polymer. Another biopsy device designed by Yang et al.[4] houses the razor blade within a container, which remains unexposed during the procedure. Both these shave biopsy instruments are not commercially available. DermaBlade® designed by Goldberg et al. is a proprietary product (Personna Medical, Staunton, Virginia) and is the only commercial available shave biopsy instrument. It is, however, not freely available in developing countries besides being uneconomical in resource poor settings. We suggest the use of a shave biopsy instrument, which is a modified version of the razor blade and an inexpensive improvisation of the DermaBlade®.

The plastic needle cover of a 22-guage scalp vein set was cut to match the length of the blunt edges of the razor blade and then cut longitudinally on one side and slid along both the blunt edges. The tube latex of an intravenous infusion set was cut as per the length of the sharp edges and one sharp edge of the blade was inserted into a pocket made out of cutting the tube latex lengthwise [Figure 1]. The cap over the non-sharp edges provides better grip and control to the surgeon and the flexible tube latex covers the unused sharp edge to prevent accidental cut injuries [Figure 2]. The modified shave biopsy instrument so devised retains the inherent properties of a razor blade with the added advantage of better grip, control, and safety. Besides, it can be prepared from readily available source material and can be used as a cheaper alternative to DermaBlade®.

Material used in making of shave biopsy instrument: plastic needle cover of a scalp vein set, tube latex of an intravenous (IV) infusion set, and a razor blade
Figure 1
Material used in making of shave biopsy instrument: plastic needle cover of a scalp vein set, tube latex of an intravenous (IV) infusion set, and a razor blade
Shave biopsy instrument. (A) Better grip, control, and operator comfort. (B) Shave biopsy of seborrheic keratosis
Figure 2
Shave biopsy instrument. (A) Better grip, control, and operator comfort. (B) Shave biopsy of seborrheic keratosis

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. , . The razor blade in dermatologic practice. Cutis. 1975;16:843-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Half-blade danger and limitation. Dermatol Surg. 2011;37:1067.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . The razor blade biopsy technique. Introduction of the adaptor-designed shave biopsy instrument. Dermatol Surg. 1995;21:345-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . Efficacy and tolerability of a novel biopsy device for removing benign epidermal skin lesions. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41:1264-73.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections