Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery
Print this page
Email this page
Small font size
Default font size
Increase font size
Home About us Current issue Archives Instructions Submission Subscribe Editorial Board Partners Contact e-Alerts Login 

FOCUS Table of Contents   
Year : 2008  |  Volume : 1  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 33-35
Informed consent: An ethical obligation or legal compulsion?

Central Government Health Scheme, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Click here for correspondence address and email


Informed consent is a vital document while performing all surgical and aesthetic procedures, particularly in the current day practice. Proper documentation and counseling of patients is important in any informed consent.

Keywords: Informed consent, Ethical obligation, Legal complusion

How to cite this article:
Satyanarayana Rao K H. Informed consent: An ethical obligation or legal compulsion?. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2008;1:33-5

How to cite this URL:
Satyanarayana Rao K H. Informed consent: An ethical obligation or legal compulsion?. J Cutan Aesthet Surg [serial online] 2008 [cited 2022 Oct 3];1:33-5. Available from:

   Introduction Top

Medical practice today is not simple because of various factors impinging on the doctor-patient relationship. Mutual trust forms the foundation for good relationship between doctor and patient. Today, patients tend to be well- or ill-informed about the disease and health. With the hype created in the print and visual media regarding 'beauty', 'shape, size and appearance of body parts', 'quality and quantity of hair', etc., patients tend to come to dermatologists with unreasonable demands and unrealistic expectations. Therefore, providing adequate information and educating the patient about realities and obtaining informed consent before subjecting a patient to any test/procedure/surgery is very essential.

   Ethical Angle Top

The concept of consent arises from the ethical principle of patient autonomy [1] and basic human rights. [2] Patient's has all the freedom to decide what should or should not happen to his/her body and to gather information before undergoing a test/procedure/surgery. No one else has the right to coerce the patient to act in a particular way. Even a doctor can only act as a facilitator in patient's decision making.

   Legal Angle Top

There is also a legal angle to this concept. No one has the right to even touch, let alone treat another person. Any such act, done without permission, is classified as "battery" [3] - physical assault and is punishable. Hence, obtaining consent is a must for anything other than a routine physical examination.

   Consent Top

In simple terms, it can be defined as an instrument of mutual communication between doctor and patient with an expression of authorization/permission/choice by the latter for the doctor to act in a particular way.

   Implied vs. Expressed Consent Top

The very act of a patient entering a doctor's chamber and expressing his problem is taken as an implied (or implicit) consent for general physical examination and routine investigations. But, intimate examination, especially in a female, invasive tests and risky procedures require specific expressed consent. Expressed (explicit) consent [4],[5] can be oral or written. Written consents are preferable in situations involving long-term follow-up, high-risk interventions and cosmetic procedures and surgeries. It is also needed for skin biopsy, psoralen with ultraviolet A (PUVA) therapy, intralesional injection, immunosuppressive therapy, electrocautery etc. [6]

Consent is necessary for photographing a patient for scientific/educational/research purpose or for follow up. Specific consent must be taken if the identity of the patient is likely to be revealed while publishing. [7]

Consent is a must for participation in clinical trials and research projects. [8]

   Informed Consent Top

Informed consent must be preceded by disclosure of sufficient information. Consent can be challenged on the ground that adequate information has not been revealed to enable the patient to take a proper and knowledgeable decision. Therefore, accurate, adequate and relevant information must be provided truthfully in a form (using non-scientific terms) and language that the patient can understand. It cannot be a patient's signature on a dotted line obtained routinely by a staff member.

   Disclosure of Information Top

The information disclosed [9] should include:

  • The condition/disorder/disease that the patient is having/suffering from
  • Necessity for further testing
  • Natural course of the condition and possible complications
  • Consequences of non-treatment
  • Treatment options available
  • Potential risks and benefits of treatment options
  • Duration and approximate cost of treatment
  • Expected outcome
  • Follow-up required

Patient should be given opportunity to ask questions and clarify all doubts. There must not be any kind of coercion. Consent must be voluntary and patient should have the freedom to revoke the consent. Consent given under fear of injury/intimidation, misconception or misrepresentation of facts can be held invalid.

   Pre-Requisites Top

Patient should be competent [10] to give consent; must be an adult and of sound mind. In case of children, consent must be obtained from a parent. In case of incapacitated persons, close family members or legal guardians can give consent. Adequate information should be provided to a prudent patient during informed consent.

Prudent patient means a reasonable or average patient. To decide whether adequate information has been given, courts rely on this "Prudent Patient Test". It is not easy to answer the question, How much information is "adequate"? A netizen may expect and demand detailed information. On the other hand, an illiterate may say that "I do not understand anything, doctor, you decide what is best for me!" If a patient knowingly prefers not to get full information that attitude also needs to be respected as a part of patient's right to autonomy. [11]

Patients' perception of risk of a medical intervention is also highly individualistic, variable and unpredictable. The information provided to a patient should include all material risks. But, the list of risks and side effects cannot be exhaustive to the level of absurdity and impracticality. For example, hardly any patient can go through the product information leaflet included in any drug pack and if some body does, it is unlikely that the drug is consumed. So, what is expected is that the doctor should provide information that a prudent [3] or reasonable patient would expect to make a knowledgeable decision about the course of action to be taken in the presence of alternatives.

   Exceptions to Disclosure Top

Therapeutic privilege [3],[4]

If a doctor is of the opinion that certain information can seriously harm a patient's health - physical, mental or emotional - he has the privilege to withhold such information. But, it should be shared with close relatives.This situation usually does not occur in cutaneous aesthetic surgical procedures.


Use of placebos in certain self-limiting conditions or in patients with high psychological overlay or in those who insist for some form of medication [10] is justified as there are high chances of benefit to the patient with negligible risk. Revealing the truth to the patient takes away the very purpose of administration of placebo.

   Blanket Consent Top

An all-encompassing consent to the effect "I authorize so and so to carry out any test/procedure/surgery in the course of my treatment" is not valid. It should be specific for a particular event. If, consent is taken for microdermabrasion, it cannot be valid for any other procedure like acid peel. Additional consent will have to be obtained before proceeding with the latter.

If a consent form says that patient has consented to undergo laser resurfacing by Dr. X, the procedure cannot be done by Dr. Y, even if Dr. Y is Dr. X's assistant, unless it is specifically mentioned in the consent that the procedure may be carried out by Dr. X or Dr. Y (or his authorized assistants).

   Documentation Top

It is important to document the process of consent taking. It should be prepared in duplicate and a copy handed over to the patient. It should be dated and signed by the patient or guardian, the doctor and an independent witness. Assisting nurse preferably should not be a witness. Like all other medical records, it should be preserved for at least 3 years.

   Informed Refusal Top

Patient has got the right of self-determination. If, a doctor diagnoses varicella in a child, the parent may choose to avail no treatment because of religious belief. Doctor's duty is to explain the possible consequences of non-treatment and benefits of treatment and leave the decision to the parent. Such informed refusals must be documented clearly. [6],[10] But, a patient's freedom cannot impinge on the rights of others or cause harm to a third party or community. Therefore, the said parent's freedom of choice cannot extend to sending the child to school, as the infection can spread to other children.

Discharge against medical advice also falls into this category and needs to be properly recorded in the case sheet with signature of the patient/guardian.

In an emergency situation, for example intestinal perforation, a doctor may have to operate even in the absence of consent, to save the life of the patient. It is possible that even with such an intervention, the patient may not survive. Assuming that the doctor is competent and has exercised due care and diligence, doctor cannot be held responsible for patient's death, as he has acted in good faith and in the best interest of the patient. This protection is given under Section 88 of Indian Penal Code. [10]

   Conclusion Top

Obtaining consent is not only an ethical obligation, but also a legal compulsion. The level of disclosure has to be case-specific. There cannot be anything called a standard consent form. No doctor can sit in comfort with the belief that the "consent" can certainly avoid legal liability. This is highlighted by the note of The California Supreme Court: [12]

"One cannot know with certainty whether a consent is valid until a lawsuit has been filed and resolved."

One can only take adequate precaution and act with care and diligence. Maintaining good relationship with patient often works better than the best informed consent!

   References Top

1.Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5 th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Madhava Menon NR. Medical ethics and health care - issues and perspectives. Karnataka Med J 2000;71;2-9.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Trehan SP, Sankhari D. Medical professional, patient and the law: the institute of law and ethics in medicine. 2 nd ed. Bangalore: National Law School of India University; 2002. p. 57-68.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Medical Ethics Manual, World Medical Association, Inc; 2005. p. 42-50. Available from:  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Snyder L, Leffler C. Ethics and Human Rights Committee, American College of Physicians. Ethics manual: fifth edition. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:563. Available at  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Srinivas P. Consumer Protection Act and Dermatological Practice, a Dermatologists' Perspective of Medical Ethics and Consumer Protection Act: An IADVL Book. 1 st ed. 2007. p 7-21.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Joga Rao SV. Medical Ethics, A Ready Referencer, 1 st ed. Bangalore: Legalaxy Publications; 2004. p. 84.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Medical Ethics Manual, World Medical Association, Inc; 2005. p. 105. Available from:  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Etchells E, Sharpe G, Walsh P, Williams JR, Singer PA. Bioethics for clinicians: 1. Consent. CMAJ 1996;155:177-80.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Francis CM. Autonomy and Informed Consent, Medical Ethics. 2 nd ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers; 2004. p. 54-65.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Gillon R. Medical ethics: Four principles plus attention to scope. BMJ 1994;309:184-8.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Moore V. Regents of the University of California, 51 Cal.3d 120, 165, 793 P. 2d 479, 271 Cal. Raptr. 147, note 41 (1990) Cross ref. supra 3 at p.67.  Back to cited text no. 12    

Correspondence Address:
K H Satyanarayana Rao
Central Government Health Scheme, Bangalore, Karnataka
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0974-2077.41159

Rights and Permissions

This article has been cited by
1 Oncofertility and Reproductive Counseling in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study
Simona Zaami, Rossella Melcarne, Renato Patrone, Giuseppe Gullo, Francesca Negro, Gabriele Napoletano, Marco Monti, Valerio Aceti, Alessandra Panarese, Maria Carola Borcea, Chiara Scorziello, Luca Ventrone, Samira Nicole Mamedov, Maria Letizia Meggiorini, Massimo Vergine, Laura Giacomelli
Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(5): 1311
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 The Current Perspectives in Clinical Research: Computer-Assisted Drug Designing, Ethics, and Good Clinical Practice
Venkataramana Kandi, Anusha Vundecode, Tanmai Reddy Godalwar, Sindhusree Dasari, Sabitha Vadakedath, Vikram Godishala
Borneo Journal of Pharmacy. 2022; 5(2): 161
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Written Informed Consent—Translating into Plain Language. A Pilot Study
Agnieszka Zimmermann, Anna Pilarska, Aleksandra Gaworska-Krzeminska, Jerzy Jankau, Marsha N. Cohen
Healthcare. 2021; 9(2): 232
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 An Evaluation of the Comprehensibility Levels of Ophthalmology Surgical Consent Forms
Ibrahim Ethem Ay, Mustafa Dogan
Cureus. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
Bharti Choudhary, Nishchint Sharma
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Should medical students perform pelvic exams on anaesthetised patients without explicit consent?
Chloe Bell, Nathan Emmerich
Clinical Ethics. 2021; : 1477750921
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Informed Consent for Online Research—Is Anybody Reading?: Assessing Comprehension and Individual Differences in Readings of Digital Consent Forms
Caitlin Geier, Robyn B. Adams, Katharine M. Mitchell, Bree E. Holtz
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. 2021; 16(3): 154
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Prospective adverse event risk evaluation in clinical trials
Abhishake Kundu, Felipe Feijoo, Diego A. Martinez, Manuel Hermosilla, Timothy Matis
Health Care Management Science. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Rehearsal’s effect on long-term recall and comprehension of orthodontic informed consent
Alexander R. Desman, Henry W. Fields, Andy Ni, Fonda G. Robinson, Brennan Skulski, Allen R. Firestone, David J. Heinlein
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 “Who am I to disagree?” A qualitative study of how patients interpret the consent process prior to manual therapy of the cervical spine
Meghan B. Reed, Oliver P. Thomson
International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine. 2021; 40: 4
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 EUFOREA expert board meeting on uncontrolled severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and biologics: Definitions and management
Claus Bachert, Joe K. Han, Martin Wagenmann, Werner Hosemann, Stella E. Lee, Vibeke Backer, Joaquim Mullol, Philippe Gevaert, Ludger Klimek, Emanuel Prokopakis, Andrew Knill, Carlo Cavaliere, Claire Hopkins, Peter Hellings
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2021; 147(1): 29
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
12 Patient Reported Experience on Consenting for Surgery – Elective Versus Emergency Patients
Dominic I. Maher, Jonathan W. Serpell, Darshini Ayton, James C. Lee
Journal of Surgical Research. 2021; 265: 114
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
13 The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program bariatric surgical risk/benefit calculator: 30-day risk
Arielle Grieco, Kristopher M. Huffman, Mark E. Cohen, Bruce L. Hall, John M. Morton, Clifford Y. Ko
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. 2021; 17(6): 1117
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
14 The effectiveness of handout assisted versus verbal consent on post-operative recall and understanding - A randomized control study
Jun Kit Koong, Retnagowri Rajandram, Naveendran Sidambram, Vairavan Narayanan
The Surgeon. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
15 Improving the surgical consenting process for patients with acute hip fractures: a pilot quality improvement project
Kirit Singh, Ali Assaf, Morgan Bayley, Gordon Gillespie
Patient Safety in Surgery. 2020; 14(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
16 Virtual and augmented reality: potential applications in radiology
Mohammad Elsayed, Nadja Kadom, Comeron Ghobadi, Benjamin Strauss, Omran Al Dandan, Abhimanyu Aggarwal, Yoshimi Anzai, Brent Griffith, Frances Lazarow, Christopher M Straus, Nabile M Safdar
Acta Radiologica. 2020; 61(9): 1258
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
17 Are predominantly western standards and expectations of informed consent in surgery applicable to all? A qualitative study in a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka
Udagedara Mudiyanselage Jayami Esha Samaranayake, Yasith Mathangasinghe, Anura Sarath Kumara Banagala
BMJ Open. 2019; 9(1): e025299
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
18 A qualitative exploration of the informed consent process in hematopoietic cell transplantation clinical research and opportunities for improvement
M Raj, S W Choi, J Platt
Bone Marrow Transplantation. 2017; 52(2): 292
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
19 Guidelines on informed consent in anaesthesia: unrealistic, unethical, untenable….
A.M. Cyna, S.W. Simmons
British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2017; 119(6): 1086
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
20 Consent and the Indian medical practitioner
Ajay Kumar, Parul Mullick, Smita Prakash, Aseem Bharadwaj
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2015; 59(11): 695
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
21 How to practice dermatosurgery safely?
KH Satyanarayana Rao
Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery. 2014; 7(2): 121
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

    Ethical Angle
    Legal Angle
    Implied vs. Expr...
    Informed Consent
    Disclosure of In...
    Exceptions to Di...
    Blanket Consent
    Informed Refusal

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded1427    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 21    

Recommend this journal