|
|
| Year : 2020 | Volume
: 13
| Issue : 2 | Page : 173-177 |
|
| Crab claw reduction cheiloplasty: The Indian way |
|
|
Sneha Puri1, Jayshree Nandanwar2, Akash Kasatwar3, Akhilesh Shewale1
1 Department of Periodontics, Swargiya Dadasaheb Kalmegh Smruti Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur, India
2 Department of Periodontics, Dr. Rajesh Ramdasji Kambe Dental College and Hospital, Akola, India
3 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Wardha, Maharashtra, India
Click here for correspondence address and email
| Date of Web Publication | 20-Jun-2020 |
|
|
 |
|
 Abstract | | |
The goals of lip reduction surgery are to reduce the volume of the lips and restore an aesthetic labial contour and to maintain an ideal volume relationship between upper and lower lips. The aim of this study was to minimize the excessive large lips by modifying the incision and to get more Indian appearance of the lips by using crab claw technique. A total of nine patients (six males and three females) of age-group 21–22 years, having aesthetic concern due to excessive large lips, were treated in the case series. The distance from the vermilion border to the lip line was recorded at midline and 6–7 mm apart from the either side, and the distance between two peaks corresponding to the philtral ridges at baseline and at 6 months follow-up. A mean reduction of approximately 10 ± 0.70 mm at midline, 10.11 ± 1.05 mm on the right side, and 9.55 ± 0.72 mm on the left side of the lip was obtained in all the nine cases. No postoperative complication was observed in any of the patients, and all the patients were satisfied with the result, which was carried out through a survey completed by all the patients. The lip reduction surgery using crab claw technique proved to be successful in achieving decreased lip volume while restoring anatomical morphometric pattern of lip to look more Indian way. Keywords: Lip, hypertrophy, reconstructive surgical procedures
How to cite this article:
Puri S, Nandanwar J, Kasatwar A, Shewale A. Crab claw reduction cheiloplasty: The Indian way. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2020;13:173-7 |
| Introduction | |  |
Patients today are increasingly conscious of personal appearance, and much attention has been focused on the smile. Lips represent an integral component of one’s own smile.
Excessively large lips represent an occasional but significant challenge in aesthetic surgery. Excessive large lips are associated with congenital etiologies such as double lip,[1] labial pits, neoplasm, ethnic variations, and acquired causes such as trauma, infections, neoplasms, and syndromes such as Melkersson–Rosenthal syndrome and Ascher syndrome.[2] The excess tissue forms an accessory lip, which is apparent during smiling.
Lip reduction is the surgery to reduce the appearance of larger or fuller than desirable lips. The goals of lip reduction surgery are to achieve a harmonious relationship between the upper and lower lips that is in balance with the entire face as well as to attain normal lip competence. In the past, various techniques have been used for the same, such as bikini lip reduction[3] and Brazilian hang glider cheiloplasty,[4] in which the authors have modified the techniques based on the physical appearance of their respective natives.
The aim of this technique was to minimize the excessive large lips by lip reduction surgery by using a crab claw technique and to give a more native appearance.
| Case Series | | |
A total of nine systemically healthy patients aged between 21 and 22 years (mean 20.4 ± 6.5 years) were selected from the outpatient Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Radiology of Swargiya Dadasaheb Kalmegh Smruti (SDKS) Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India, presenting for the smile evaluation and with the complaint of excessive lip fullness. The participants were selected on the basis of the following criteria:
- Patient with aesthetic concern
- Excessively large lip interfering with pronunciation and eating
- Absence of hereditary/congenital abnormalities, cracking of lips, patients with cleft lip, competent lip, and history of surgery in selected area
- Smokers
Before initiating this case series, the purpose and design of this technique was explained to the patients and informed consent was signed by every patient.
Measurements of lip
The clinical parameters were measured with the help of dental floss and Williams graduated periodontal probe as shown in [Figure 1]. | Figure 1: Measurements of upper and lower lip. Upper lip: The measurements recorded were distance from the vermillion border (A) to the lip line at midline (A1) and 5 mm apart from midline on left (B1 and C1) and right side (B and C) and distance between the two peaks (B and B1) corresponding to the philtral ridges at rest position. Lower lip: The measurements recorded were distance from the vermillion border (D) to the lip line at midline (D1) and 9 mm apart from midline on left (E1 and F1) and right side (E and F) and the distance between the two peaks (E and E1) corresponding to the philtral ridges at rest position
Click here to view |
Surgical procedure
The surgical protocol emphasized complete asepsis and infection control. Then the area of surgery was dried completely with the help of surgical gauze. The assessment of the excessive mucosa was carried out with the help of adjuvant pinch technique using tissue forceps. Excessive mucosal area was marked by using a marker pencil as shown in [Figure 2]A, resembling a crab claw. After topical anesthesia (2% lidocaine and epinephrine 1:100,000), infraorbital, mental, and oral commissure block were administered. | Figure 2: Cheiloplasty in upper lip. (A) Two horizontal marking showing excessive mucosal area resembling crab claw. (B) Incisions given. (C) Excised wedge of tissue. (D) Surgical wound after excision of tissue. (E) Initially suture placed in center. (F) After suture placed
Click here to view |
While squeezing the upper lip between the fingers of the left hand to limit bleeding, a number 15 blade was used to excise the mucosal tissue, making sure the incision was slightly beveled so as to excise a wedge of tissue [Figures 2B], [2C]. Hemostasis was achieved with the help of fine needle tip electrocautery (Servotome, Satelec, Meriganc, France). Excision of the lower lip was conducted in a similar way, followed by careful hemostasis [Figure 3]B and [Figure 3]C. Both the upper and lower lips were closed with a deep layer of interrupted 4-0 resorbable sutures (Vicryl®, (Ethicon, Somerville, New Jersey, USA)), followed by a cutaneous layer of interrupted resorbable 4-0 sutures (Vicryl). No dressing was required [Figures 2F] and [Figure 3]F. | Figure 3: Cheiloplasty in lower lip. (A)Two horizontal marking showing excessive mucosal area. (B) Incisions given. (C) Excised wedge of tissue. (D) Lip mucosa sutured to the alveolar mucosa
Click here to view |
,  | Figure 4: (A) Preoperative view for cheiloplasty in lower lip. (B) 6 months postoperative view for cheiloplasty in lower lip
Click here to view |
,  | Figure 5: (A) Preoperative view for cheiloplasty in upper lip. (B) 6 months postoperative view for cheiloplasty in upper lip
Click here to view |
Postoperative care
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and systemic antibiotic three times a day was prescribed for 5 days post surgery. Patients were instructed to restrict the movement of lips for 2–3 days. They were advised to take liquid diet for 4–5 days. Patients were recalled after 1 week and 3 months for reevaluation.
| Result | | |
A total of nine subjects (six males and three females) with age range of 20–27 years (mean, 20.4 ± 6.5 years) associated with excessively large lips, were treated by using lip reduction surgery. During the course of study, wound healing was uneventful. A mean reduction of approximately 10 ± 0.70 mm at midline, 10.11 ± 1.05 mm on the right side, and 9.55 ± 0.72 mm on the left side of the lip was obtained in all the nine cases [Table 1]. No postoperative complication was observed in any of the patients, and all the patients were satisfied with the result, which was carried out through a survey completed by all the patients [Table 2].,
| Discussion | | |
The aim of this technique was to minimize the excessive large lips by lip reduction surgery to restore an aesthetic labial contour. In this case series, mean reduction in the lip of approximately 5–7 mm was obtained in all the nine cases.
Many techniques for lip reduction have been proposed, but they are focused either on the reconstructive side (e.g., cleft palates, hemangiomas, and siliconomas) or solely on the reduction aspect.[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9] These techniques rarely emphasize the aesthetic contour of the lip. Pitanguy,[10] since the 1960s, has been one of the pioneer surgeons to approach lip contouring as a cosmetic procedure. His contribution to the importance of Cupid’s bow has guided surgeons over the years in modern cheiloplasty.
In addressing hypertrophic lips, the common approach described in the literature advocates excising a horizontal wedge of soft tissue from both upper and lower lips (Pierce[11]). The present findings were also supported by a study conducted by Fanous et al.,[3] which stated that lip reduction procedure is a more thoughtful approach because it addresses the problem of lip volume while taking into account both the relative proportion of the lips and the aesthetic harmony of the labial unit.
The incisions were modified, which resembles crab claw to make the lip anatomy look more Indian way. The following limitations were found from the previous techniques: (1) normal lip anatomy was not considered, which varies from individual to individual, and (2) the incisions were not extended up to the commissures.
The goals of lip reduction surgery are to achieve a harmonious relationship between the upper and lower lips, balancing with the entire face, and to achieve normal lip competence.
| Conclusion | | |
This technique restores an attractive labial contour by shifting the shape toward a more “Indian way” and resulting in more aesthetically pleasant lips.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References | | |
| 1. | Martins WD, Westphalen FH, Sandrin R, Campagnoli E. Congenital maxillary double lip: Review of the literature and report of a case. J Can Dent Assoc 2004;70:466-8.  |
| 2. | Liu R, Yu S. Melkersson–Rosenthal syndrome: A review of seven patients. J Clin Neurosci 2013;20:993-5. |
| 3. | Fanous N, Brousseau VJ, Yoskovitch A. The “bikini lip reduction”: A detailed approach to hypertrophic lips. Can J Plast Surg 2007;15:205-10. |
| 4. | Sforza M, Andjelkov K, Zaccheddu R, Jovanovic M, Colic M. The “Brazilian” bikini-shaped lip-reduction technique: New developments in cheiloplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2012;36:827-31. |
| 5. | Rey R, Carreau JP, Gola R, Berbis P. [Melkersson–Rosenthal syndrome. Value of reduction cheiloplasty]. Ann Dermatol Venereol 1996;123:325-7. |
| 6. | Hauben DJ. Reduction cheiloplasty for upper lip hemangioma. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988;82:694-7. |
| 7. | Rees TD, Horowita SL, Coburn RJ. Mentoplasty, prognathism, and cheiloplasty. In: Rees TD, Wood-Smith D, editors. Cosmetic facial surgery. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1973. pp. 494-553. |
| 8. | Niamtu J 3rd. Lip reduction surgery (reduction cheiloplasty). Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2010;18:79-97. |
| 9. | Ishida LH, Ishida LC, Ishida J, Grynglas J, Alonso N, Ferreira MC. Myotomy of the levator labii superioris muscle and lip repositioning: A combined approach for the correction of gummy smile. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126:1014-9. |
| 10. | Pitanguy IHJ. Facial clefts as seen in a large series of untreated adults and their later management. In: Longacre JJ, editor. Craniofacial anomalies. London, UK: Pitman; pp. 167. |
| 11. | Pierce HE. Cheiloplasty for redundant lips. J Natl Med Assoc 1976;68:211-12. |
Correspondence Address:
Sneha Puri
Department of Periodontics, Swargiya Dadasaheb Kalmegh Smruti Dental College and Hospital, Hingna, Nagpur 441110, Maharashtra.
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_95_19
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
[Table 1], [Table 2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Article Access Statistics | | | Viewed | 1849 | | | Printed | 57 | | | Emailed | 0 | | | PDF Downloaded | 118 | | | Comments | [Add] | | |
|
|
