Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
1 (
1
); 19-20
doi:
10.4103/0974-2077.41152

Co2 Laser Resurfacing for Facial Rhytides

Department of Skin and VD, SN Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India

Address for correspondence: Vinod Jain, III/3, MDM Hospital Campus, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India. E-mail: drvinodjainjodhpur@gmail.com

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Resurfacing of facial rhytides (periorbital crow-feet wrinkles) was performed in three cases by carbon dioxide laser (Sharplan® 1030 machine). Good to excellent results were observed. However, erythema and postinflammatory pigmentation were important side effects.

Keywords

Carbon dioxide laser
facial rhytides
resurfacing

INTRODUCTION

Resurfacing denotes mechanical, chemical or physical removal of superficial layers of ageing skin stimulating neocollagenosis and improvement in epidermal architecture.[1] In order to treat wrinkles, it is necessary to resurface up to the papillary dermis and sometimes up to reticular dermis so that old collagen is replaced by new collagen, resulting in tightening of skin.[2]

Facial rhytides is a common cosmetic concern that can be treated successfully with lasers.[3] There are various types of lasers available to treat facial rhytides viz, carbondioxide (CO2) laser, Erbium-YAG laser, etc. These lasers typically restrict the laser tissue interaction time to <1 ms (thermal relaxation time, TRT) so that thermal diffusion is limited during the laser pulse. CO2 laser resurfacing is a technique for the treatment of skin ageing. With this it is possible to perform accurate ablation of skin layer by layer. Pulsed CO2 laser is a modality, which has an ability to do resurfacing with safety, giving excellent cosmetic result. In the present article, we share our experience of CO2 laser in three cases with facial rhytides.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three patients of periorbital rhytides between ages of 35 and 40 years were selected. Of them, two patients had type IV skin and one had type III skin. All three patients were females. They were informed verbally about the procedure, possible outcome and complication and detailed written consent was obtained. Preoperatively tretinoin 0.05% and hydroquinone 2% once daily for 3 weeks were applied. Oral acyclovir was given 2 days before resurfacing.

We used a super pulse CO2 (SHARPLAN® 1030) by setting power at 1 W in defocused mode. After giving local anaesthesia, the surrounding area was covered with wet gauze. Two passes were carried out. Passes were made at the shoulder of wrinkles. There was skin contraction after second pass. Yellowish surface appeared after two passes. Few deep wrinkles required three passes. The treated area was wiped with the gauze soaked in hydrogen peroxide after each pass. There was no bleeding after treatment. Post-operative dressing was done with Sofratulle®, which was changed after 2 days. Then the treatment area was kept open and patients were asked to apply mupirocin ointment twice daily after cleansing with mild cleanser. Sun exposure was strictly restricted for at least 2 weeks.

All patients were followed at 1 week, 2 weeks, 2 months and 6 months after the procedure. At each follow-up visit, photographs were taken and apparent improvement in wrinkles, the presence or absence of erythema, infection, dyschromias and scarring were noted. Improvement was graded on a scale of 1-5, where score of 1 indicated poor, 2 - fair, 3 - good, 4 - excellent, 5 - complete clearance or 100% resolution of wrinkles.

RESULTS

Of the three patients treated, two patients completed the follow-up of 6 months, but one patient was lost to follow-up after 15 days.

All three patients developed erythema during second week, but it subsided in two patients, one patient did not come for follow-up. All patients developed edema after treatment, but it subsided within 2 days. Both patients developed hyperpigmentation, which subsided within 6 months in one patient and after 2 months in the other patient. It was treated by mild steroid and 2% hydroquinone cream. There was no incidence of infection, hypopigmentation or scarring.

The two patients who were available for follow-up, showed grade 4 or excellent improvement and expressed satisfaction at the results.

DISCUSSION

For many years, dermabrasion, chemical peeling or surgical face lifting have been used for the treatment of facial wrinkles. However, CO2 laser which emit ultra short, coherent light beam enables the cosmetic surgeon to ablate superficial epidermis layer by layer with no or very little side effects.[4] Many modalities are available for the treatment of facial, especially periorbital wrinkles like topical tretinoin creams, glycolic acid chemical peel, botulinum toxin, collagen filler, dermabrasion and laser resurfacing.[5] Previous treatment modalities such as dermabrasion have been limited by the complications of scarring and pigmentary alteration. With the advent of high energy, pulsed CO2 laser, skin resurfacing can now be done successfully with minimal side effects.[6] However, deeper wrinkles of glabella and nasolabial fold respond best to classical face lift. Beside wrinkles and pigmentary changes of ageing skin, the CO2 laser has been found to be useful in all types of scar namely, atrophic, hypertrophic, scars of varicella, etc.[7]

In our study, excellent results were achieved in two patients available for follow-up. However, the post-procedure pigmentation was a concern though it subsided completely in both the patients.

EDITOR'S COMMENT

This article published as an archive from the Indian Journal of Dermato Surgery (2002), demonstrates the rapid changes that have happened in the field of laser ablation over the last decade. The study demonstrates that good results could be obtained by using CO2 laser, but they came at a cost; significant erythema and post-inflammatory pigmentation lasting weeks to months. It is easy to understand why CO2 laser which used to be the gold standard treatment for ablative laser procedures, has given way to fractional photothermolysis.

Source of Support: Nil

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

REFERENCES

  1. , , , . A new option for skin rejuvenation: CO2 laser resurfacing. Ned fijdschr Geneskd. 2000;144:365-9. (Abstract)
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Histology of high energy pulsed CO2 laser resufacing. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 1996;15:189-93.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . Treatment of facial rhytides with a high energy pulsed CO2 laser. Plast Reconst Surg. 1996;98:791-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Facial wrinkles-Ultra pulased CO2 laser: Alternative or supplement to surgical face lift. Laryngorhinootologie. 1997;76:351-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Periorbital rejuvenation: A review of dermatologic treatment. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25:1-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , . Facial resurfacing using a high energy, short pulsed carbon dioxide laser. Australia J Dermatol. 1996;37:125-31.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . Resurfacing of atrophic facial acne scars with a high energy, pulsed carbondioxide laser. Dermatol Surg. 1996;22:151-5.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections