Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
Consensus Statement
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
Consensus Statement
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

CASE REPORT
4 (
1
); 61-64
doi:
10.4103/0974-2077.79200

Congenital Melanocytic Nevus of Upper Eyelid

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, AME’S Dental College Hospital and Research Centre, Raichur, Karnataka, India

Address for correspondence: Dr. Yadavalli Guruprasad, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, AME–S Dental College Hospital and Research Centre, Raichur, Karnataka, India. E-mail: guru_omfs@yahoo.com

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Congenital nevi are present in approximately 2–3% of neonates. These lesions are present at birth. They are characterized by pigmented lesions with regular margins, smooth or lobular surfaces and occasionally have long coarse hair. The risk of melanoma development is proportional to the size, especially if it involves over 5% of the body surface, or is > 20 cm in adolescents (large/giant congenital nevus). The risk of malignant change ranges from 5–40%. We present a case of a congenital melanocytic nevus in a six-year-old female child which was surgically treated.

Keywords

Congenital melanocytic nevus
reconstruction
upper eyelid

INTRODUCTION

Melanocytic nevus of the face is a unique form of congenital nevus, fortunately rare and typically hair-bearing. These lesions have a relatively high risk of becoming malignant. They develop probably between 40 days of gestation and six months in utero. Genetic mechanisms may account for familial aggregation. These lesions, when large, make a formidable undertaking in view of the lack of suitable donor sites and multiple procedures involved in its treatment. Melanocytic nevus of the face is a particular challenge to a plastic surgeon not only because of a very high standard of skill required but also for the patient and parental concern for cosmetic results. We present a case of melanocytic nevus in a six-year-old female child which was surgically treated.

CASE REPORT

A six-year-old female patient was referred to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery with a chief complaint of swelling on the right upper eyelid from past two years. Examination of the patient revealed soft, well-defined swelling over the right upper eyelid [Figure 1a and b]. Swelling was small in size initially which gradually increased to a size of 6 × 3 cm and was non-tender, mobile, non-pulsatile, non-compressible and soft in consistency. The lesion involved the right upper eyelid extending on to the right medial canthus region but the normal function of both the eyelids was intact. An incisional biopsy was subsequently performed, providing a diagnosis of benign melanocytic nevus. The child was planned for surgical management under general anaesthesia. The lesion over the right upper eyelid was excised preserving a margin of 1 mm at the lid margin [Figure 2a and b] and the skin cover was provided by a full-thickness skin graft obtained from right post-auricular region which was defatted and the dermis trimmed to reduce the bulkiness of the graft so that the cosmetic as well as functional outcome would be better [Figure 3a and b]. The graft donor site was closed primarily. The graft take-up over the recipient site was 100% with excellent colour match [Figure 4a and b]. The patient was discharged on the second postoperative day in a satisfactory condition. The surgical specimen measured 6 × 2.5 cm, with irregular surface but was well circumscribed. Histopathology revealed varying proportions of melanocytic nevus cells only within the dermis [Figure 5]. Based on the microscopic observations in correlation with clinical features, a final diagnosis of congenital melanocytic nevus was made. There was no impairment of the function of the eyelids or recurrence up to six months and patient is under regular follow-up.

Pre-operative photograph showing swelling on the right upper eyelid
Figure 1a
Pre-operative photograph showing swelling on the right upper eyelid
Photograph showing the size and the extent of the nevus
Figure 1b
Photograph showing the size and the extent of the nevus
Complete surgical excision of the lesion
Figure 2a
Complete surgical excision of the lesion
Photograph showing completely excised surgical specimen
Figure 2b
Photograph showing completely excised surgical specimen
Photograph showing full-thickness graft harvested from the right post-auricular region
Figure 3a
Photograph showing full-thickness graft harvested from the right post-auricular region
Photograph showing full-thickness graft sutured to the recipient site
Figure 3b
Photograph showing full-thickness graft sutured to the recipient site
One week postoperative photograph showing the take-up of the graft
Figure 4a
One week postoperative photograph showing the take-up of the graft
Six months postoperative photograph showing complete recovery on the right upper eyelid
Figure 4b
Six months postoperative photograph showing complete recovery on the right upper eyelid
Histopathology showing varying proportions of melanocytic nevus cells only within the dermis
Figure 5
Histopathology showing varying proportions of melanocytic nevus cells only within the dermis

DISCUSSION

Congenital pigmented nevi are present in approximately 2–3% of neonates. Fewer than 10% of these lesions are larger than 3 or 4 cm, a size cut-off below which the designation small is usually given.[1] It is now well established that congenital nevi and malignant melanoma are associated, despite the fact that the magnitude of risk of malignant transformation is still the subject of wide controversy.[23] Widely divergent figures range from 1.8% to up to 45%. A recent review on the subject has calculated an 8.52% incidence of melanoma developing within nevi larger than 2% of the total body surface during the first 15 years of life.[4] Despite the controversy, many clinicians agree that prophylactic excision of all giant and large hairy nevi is indicated.[5] The opinion that complete prophylactic excision of all congenital nevi should be accomplished in infancy and early childhood is well supported in the literature by the evidence that 60% of the malignancies developing in these lesions present in early childhood.[6] In one series, 10 to 20 malignant melanomas arising in congenital nevi were diagnosed before three years of age.[7] In addition, concerns about lack of parameters to predict as to which nevi are susceptible to malignant transformation, compounded with the fact that the diagnosis gets delayed and the course in case of a malignant change is invariably fatal are reasonable.[5] A recent review has concluded that an early aggressive approach to these lesions is responsible for the low risk of malignant melanoma reported in various series.[89] Surgical excision results in the debulking of tissue at risk for the development of malignant melanoma. Agreeing that early prophylactic excision is indicated but actually accomplishing it has posed a major management problem for most clinicians.

Large pigmented nevi of the face present a major deformity for the child and his or her parents. It is also a major challenge for the treating plastic surgeon to plan and achieve the best cosmetic results. There is complete consensus that the percentage risk of malignancy in these cases is fairly high. Complete early prophylactic excision of these lesions is warranted and should be accomplished in infancy or early childhood. The most common complications of eyelid reconstruction causing true functional impairment are ptosis, or the creation of a droopy upper eyelid and lagophthalmos, or tissue shortage preventing adequate closure.[9] Management may require multiple surgical procedures. Tissue expansion forms the most widely used modality of treatment.[1011] Timely use of other modalities like full-thickness skin grafts and expanded flaps will decrease the number of stages of surgery while minimizing the risks of malignancy and reducing the psychological stress on the parents and the child.

Source of Support: Nil

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

REFERENCES

  1. , , , , , , . Large congenital melanotic nevi in an extremity with neurocutaneous melanocytosis. Pediatr Dermatol. 2009;26:79-82.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . Incidence of malignancy in giant pigmented nevi. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1965;36:26-37.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Giant pigmented nevi of the face: Surgical management. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1967;40:469-74.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . The incidence of malignant melanoma (0 to 15 years of age) arising in large congenital nevocellular nevi. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;78:174-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . Defining the malignant potential of the giant pigmented nevus. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976;57:611-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . Nonepidermal origin of malignant melanoma associated with giant congenital nevocellular nevus. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;67:782-90.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , . The risk of malignancy in large congenital nevi. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1974;53:421-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , . The value of full-thickness skin grafts in reconstruction of the periorbital region. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1857-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , . An approach to excision of congenital giant pigmented nevi in infancy and early childhood. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;82:1012-21.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , . Congenital melanocytic nevi: Clinical and histopathologic features, risk of melanoma, and clinical management. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;52:197-203.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , . The number and distribution of benign pigmented moles (melanocytic naevi) in a healthy British population. Br J Dermatol. 1985;13:167-74.
    [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
203

PDF downloads
154
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections