Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

COMMENTARY
2 (
1
); 4-5
doi:
10.4103/0974-2077.53091

Controversy: Botulinum Toxin in Pregnancy

Skin Laser Centre, New Delhi, India

Address for correspondence: Dr. Munish Paul, 235, Avtar Enclave, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi - 110 063, India. E-mail: paul_munish@yahoo.com

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Botulinum toxin A (BTX-A), a purified protein derived from the bacteria Clostridium botulinum, has been widely used in aesthetic dermatology. Though BTX-A was initially used by neurologists extensively for neurological conditions such as blepharospasm, strabismus headaches, dystonia and spasticity, it has become popular among dermatologists and plastic surgeons for its cosmetic indications. Its use in pregnancy has been controversial and this article deals with the issues of use of BTX-A in pregnancy.

Keywords

Botulinum toxin
pregnancy
safety

INTRODUCTION

Botulinum toxin – a bacterial extract made of botulinum toxin Type A (BTX-A), a purified protein derived from the bacteria Clostridium botulinum, has been widely used in aesthetic dermatology. Though BTX-A was initially used by neurologists extensively for neurological conditions such as blepharospasm, strabismus headaches, dystonia, spasticity, it has become a preferred drug and has been used widely by dermatologists and plastic surgeons for its cosmetic indications.

However, concerns remain about its safety in pregnancy. Considering the widespread use of BTX-A, it is possible that it may be injected unknowingly in pregnant women, especially in the early first trimester when women might not be aware of the pregnancy. Animal studies in mice, rats, rabbits have shown reductions in fetal body weights, delayed ossification, abortions, and/or fetal malformations.[1] There are only a few reports dealing with the issue of safety of BTX-A in human pregnancy.

Available evidence on the safe use of BTX-A in pregnancy

Newman et al.[2] reported the first report of clinical BTX-A treatment during pregnancy. They reported four full-term uncomplicated pregnancies in a patient who received BTX-A treatment during pregnancy for severe cervical dystonia. The patient was injected in each pregnancy in doses ranging from 600-1200 per pregnancy, without any effect on the pregnancy outcome.

Morgan et al.[3] surveyed physicians who frequently used BTX-A, for pregnancy outcomes in any of their patients who might, knowingly or unknowingly have been injected with the drug. Twelve physicians reported injecting BTX-A in pregnant women. Sixteen pregnant women had been injected, mostly in the first trimester, and only one patient, who had had history of prior spontaneous abortions, suffered a miscarriage. Another woman had a therapeutic abortion. All other pregnancies went to term and there were no fetal malformations.

De Oliveira Monteiro[4] reported two women who were injected in the early first trimester but had uneventful pregnancies with no untoward effects in the fetus.

CONCLUSION

Even though these reports indicate that BTX-A may be safe in pregnancy, the reports are few and consist of only a small number of patients. There are no controlled trial data and it is doubtful whether there can ever be such studies conducted to resolve this issue. Administering such a drug for a cosmetic indication is fraught with legal risk. It would therefore be prudent on the part of the treating physician to consider pregnancy as an absolute contraindication for cosmetic BTX-A treatment.

Source of Support: Nil

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

REFERENCES

  1. . Allergan Inc; .
  2. , , , , , , . Botulinum toxin type A therapy during pregnancy. Mov Disord. 2004;19:1384-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . Botulinum toxin A during pregnancy: A survey of treating physicians. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006;77:117-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. . Botulinum toxin and pregnancy. Skinmed. 2006;5:308.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections