Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Case Report
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/jcas_74_23

Ear concha carcinoma: excision and repair with an innovative revision of Masson’s post-auricular revolving-door flap (flip-flop flap)

Department of Medicine, Dermatology Unit, University of Padua, Rovigo, Italy.
Unit of Dermatology, Rovigo Hospital, Rovigo, Italy.

*Corresponding author: Fortunato Cassalia, Department of Medicine, Dermatology Unit, University of Padua, Padua, Italy. Fortunato1287@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Cassalia F, Azzi L, Giordani M. Ear concha carcinoma: excision and repair with an innovative revision of Masson’s post-auricular revolving-door flap (flip-flop flap). J Cutan Aesthet Surg. doi: 10.25259/jcas_74_23

Abstract

Carcinomas of the concha are difficult to treat due to the difficulty in accessing the site and the surrounding important anatomical structures. In this article, we describe the reparative procedure of an auricular concha defect using the Masson1 revolving door island flap revisited according to Mauro Giordani, MD.

Keywords

Carcinoma
Auricular concha
Revolving door flap
Post-auricular flap
Flip-flop flap

INTRODUCTION

Carcinomas of the concha are difficult to treat due to the difficulty in accessing the site and the surrounding important anatomical structures. In this article, we describe the reparative procedure of an auricular concha defect using the Masson,1 revolving door island flap revisited according to Mauro Giordani, MD. It is known that neoplasms of the auricle account for 6% of skin cancers about 55% of which are cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). It is estimated that 6 – 18% of SCC concerning the external ear is already metastatic at diagnosis confirming the aggressive nature of these neoplasms.2

CASE REPORT

We report the case of a 59-year-old man suffering from carcinoma of the left auricular concha for about 8 months [Figure 1]. Initially, the skin lesion was treated with cryosurgery without regressing. It is well known that the diagnosis of in situ SCCs is related to an increased risk of developing invasive SCC,2 and although in most cases, SCC can be treated with excellent results, in a small percentage of cases the latter can recur, metastasize, and/or, rarely, lead to patient death.3 Therefore, given the lack of response to cryosurgery and the risk of malignant progression of the lesion, the decision was made for radical resection. The left auricular concha lesion was removed by full-thickness excision of the skin, subcutis, and underlying cartilage, and the defect was repaired using an innovative revision of the Masson post-auricular revolving door flap.1

Carcinoma of the left auricular concha before surgery.
Figure 1:
Carcinoma of the left auricular concha before surgery.

DISCUSSION

Due to the copious sensory innervation of the external ear, the Klein.4 tumescence anesthesia method was preferred, so two infusions of 0.1% lidocaine mixed with epinephrine and sodium bicarbonate were administered, respectively, on the anterior and posterior faces of the auricle. At first, using an 11-blade scalpel, the concha auricular lesion was excised by incising the skin, the subcutis, and the cartilage. Next, at the retroauricular site, by incising in an anteroposterior and caudo-cranial direction the skin and the subcutis, a triangular flap size of about 4 cm long by 1.5 cm wide was isolated [Figure 2a]. After cleaving the flap from the skin behind the external ear, the communication tunnel between the anterior and posterior regions of the ear was created [Figure 2b]. An innovative feature was introduced as compared with the technique traditionally described by Masson: At the base of the newly created flap, using a round-bladed scalpel, the skin was de-epithelialized to create a de-epithelized rectangle that could overlap with the thickness of the communication tunnel layers between the two sides of the ear [Figure 2a]. Then, the retroauricular flap was rotated and transposed through the above tunnel to repair the defect. A 6 – 0 vicryl filament was used at the meeting point between the de-epithelialized area of the flap and the tunnel wall [Figure 2c], while the suture of the flap at the level of the concha was perfused using a 5 – 0 vicryl filament [Figure 2d]. Histologic examination revealed the presence of in situ SCCs with residual disease-free excision margins. One month later, the patient had no signs of recurrence, and the functional and cosmetic outcome was both satisfactory [Figure 3].

(a) Postauricular flap with de-epithelized area at the base, (b) Communication tunnel between the post-auricular region and concha, (c) Transposition and internal suture of the post-auricular flap through the tunnel, and (d) External suture of the flap.
Figure 2:
(a) Postauricular flap with de-epithelized area at the base, (b) Communication tunnel between the post-auricular region and concha, (c) Transposition and internal suture of the post-auricular flap through the tunnel, and (d) External suture of the flap.
One month after surgery.
Figure 3:
One month after surgery.

CONCLUSION

The innovative revision of the Masson post-auricular revolving door flap achieved successful reconstruction with excellent functional and cosmetic results. One month postoperatively, the patient showed no signs of recurrence, and histology confirmed clear excision margins.

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed to designing and conducting the work, drafting, and revising the manuscript and approved the final version for submission.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

References

  1. . A simple island flap for reconstruction of concha-helix defects. Br J Plast Surg. 1972;25:399-403.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. , . The multidisciplinary management of non-melanoma conchal bowl skin cancer. Australas J Dermatol. 2012;53:229-32.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , et al. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: From pathophysiology to novel therapeutic approaches. Biomedicines. 2021;9:171.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. , . Tumescent anesthesia: Evolution and current uses. Adv Dermatol. 2007;23:33-46.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections