Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

LETTERS
5 (
3
); 221-222
doi:
10.4103/0974-2077.101402

Effective and Inexpensive Dressing for Mammaplasties

Department of Plastic Surgery, Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkey. E-mail:
Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Sir,

After most aesthetic breast operations dressings are necessary and postoperative dressing is important. Every surgeon has his own particular modification, but the following basic type of dressing is widely used in most Plastic Units in this country. It is known that when a proper dressing that achieves immobilization, obliteration of dead space, compression, and protection from trauma, is used continuously, severe complications following breast surgery can be reduced.[14]

The traditional dressing of postoperative aesthetic breast surgery consists of gauze around the breast and a postoperative suture line, with a small piece of tulle gras on the NAC wound, which is held in place by a bandage wrapped around the breast and back. Although initially the dressing is good, after that it tends to shrink away from the breast surface, thus tending to lose its compressive and supportive effect. Furthermore, accurate reapplication of the loosened bandage can be difficult, particularly in an anxious patient. It is usually the surgeon's intention that this dressing should remain intact and undisturbed. However, it is difficult to apply and maintain dressings, because the breast has complicated contours and protrudes from the chest.

The popular traditional dressing, which consists of a gauze, pad, and a bandage, may be dislodged when bandaged loosely or may cause pressure necrosis when bandaged tightly. Furthermore, such a dressing may cause excess moisture and discomfort because the whole breast ve its environment is bandaged. Also these dressings are difficult to remove and are sometimes bulky, heavy, and uncomfortable. A maternal bra is easily applied to the complicated contours and can control expansion. In addition, it is inexpensive.The early return of our patients to home or work is striking. This is presumably related to the lack of embarrassment associated with wearing a breast bandage and the irritation usually associated with an occlusive dressing.[4]

An anterior piece of maternal bra can be opened and used as a ‘trap-door’ to visualize the nipple–areola complex. The ‘trapdoor’ dressing is very comfortable for the patients and very practical for the healthcare providers, because it avoids dressing change and allows the nipple–areola monitoring without affecting the sterile field thus facilitating an adequate and clean inspection of the wound in a less-accessible anatomical area. The dressing saves time and money and is also very easy to remove in case of bleeding or nonsterile contamination. The maternal bra is only used after breast reduction, as per the literature.[4] We have used it after the all aesthetic breast surgeries. Illustrative cases are shown in Figures 1 and 2.

(a-b) The early postoperative image of the patient with breast augmentation
Figure 1
(a-b) The early postoperative image of the patient with breast augmentation
(a-b) The early postoperative image of the patient with breast reduction
Figure 2
(a-b) The early postoperative image of the patient with breast reduction

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

REFERENCES

  1. , . Reduction mammaplasty: A personal techinique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980;65:217-26.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Vertical scar reduction mammaplasty: A 15-year experience including a review of 250 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:2152-69.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . Postoperative nipple-areola complex monitoring: The “trapdoor” dressing. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008;32:823-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , . A maternity bra as a dressing after breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg. 2002;55:591-2.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    63

    PDF downloads
    98
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections