Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Short Communication
13 (
1
); 57-58
doi:
10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_83_19

External Knot for Running Intradermal Stitch

Department of Surgery-Plastic Surgery, Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Address for correspondence: Mr. Garrison Leach, Medical Student, Department of Surgery-Plastic Surgery, Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. E-mail: GarrisonLeach@creighton.edu

Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Abstract

We describe a unique method for closure of running subcuticular/intradermal suture that minimizes potential abscess formation and maximizes cosmetic outcomes.

Keywords

Surgery
suture
technique

INTRODUCTION

The standard technique for subcuticular/intradermal suturing entails placement of a buried knot at the distal apex of an incision, running the suture material with subcuticular/intradermal bites to the proximal apex where an additional buried knot is made, pulling the needle and suture material through the adjacent skin, and finally cutting it flush with the epidermis.[1]

Though this method is functionally reliable, there are several potential problems. One is that the buried knots are prone to abscess formation.[2] In addition, the bulk associated with the buried knots can leave a “dog-ear” appearance to the wound apices.[3]

Therefore, we present a technique in which the incision is closed without a buried knot mitigating the potential for abscess formation in addition to the cosmetically unappealing bulk at wound edges associated with standard subcuticular closure.

REPORT

The technique is articulated and shown in Figure 1 and Video 1. A standard intradermal bite at the distal apex is made leaving a long tail. Subsequent running intradermal bites are made from the distal to the proximal apex. When the proximal apex is reached, the needle and suture is brought out through the adjacent skin at a 90° angle. The suture is wrapped around the shaft of the needle driver. Using the needle driver, the suture is then grasped approximately 1cm from the skin [Figure 1A] Next, using the free, contralateral hand, the loop around the shaft is flipped over the jaws of the needle driver to create a knot with a loop [Figure 1B]. Attention is made to leave a slight air knot while securing the knot approximately 1cm above the skin. Additional throws are made using standard simple suture technique [Figure 1C]. After six total throws, the free end is cut [Figure 1D].

(A–D) Steps for securing intradermal suture with external knot
Figure 1
(A–D) Steps for securing intradermal suture with external knot

CONCLUSION

We have seen outstanding functional and aesthetic results with this method. This technique is simple and reliable. It provides durability that is comparable to that with buried knots. Having the knot external mitigates the risk associated with granuloma and abscess formation posed by buried knots with the standard technique.[4567] Moreover, this technique maximizes cosmetic outcomes as the external knot minimizes the bulky, “dog-ear” appearance at the proximal apex commonly associated with the more common method of securement.[78]

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

All videos available online www.jcasonline.com

REFERENCES

  1. , , , . The subcuticular suture. Postgrad Med. 1961;29:164-173.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Stitch granulomas following inguinal herniotomy: a 10-year review. J Pediatr Surg. 1993;28:1505-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , . A simple technique for the retention of a subcuticular suture. Surgeon. 2003;1:149-51.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Suture granuloma. Br J Surg. 1988;75:1149-50.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . Avoiding stitch abscesses in subcuticular skin closures: the L-stitch. Can J Surg. 2003;46:223-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , . Suture materials in otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;63:409-10.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , . A technique for subcutaneous knot inversion following running subcuticular closures. Mil Med. 1992;157:255.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , . Experimental studies in swine for measurement of suture extrusion. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2004;14:251-9.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections