Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

LETTERS
3 (
2
); 127-128
doi:
10.4103/0974-2077.69030

Q-Switched Nd: YAG in the Treatment of Xanthelasma Palpebrarum

Department of Dermatology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Kochi, Kerala, India. E-mail:
Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Sir,

Q-switched Nd: YAG lasers have been advocated as one of the potential treatment options for xanthelasma palpebrarum.[1] Recent studies, however, have questioned the efficacy of this treatment modality.[2] We used the same on a patient with bilateral xanthesmata below the lower eyelids, and wish to report our experience. While the results were not dramatic, there was relatively more improvement on the side where more passes were performed per sitting. However, this was accompanied by more prominent postinflammatory changes.

A 57-year-old female patient presented to our outpatient department with bilateral xanthelasma palpebrarum below the lower eyelids. All available options along with their relative advantages and disadvantages were explained in detail to the patient. After taking an informed consent, the patient was treated with three sittings of a 1,064 nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser, two sittings at 2-week intervals, 60% energy (~5J/cm 2), three to four passes per sitting over the right eye and five to six passes per sitting over the left eye. The patient was evaluated 2 weeks after the second sitting. The pre- and postprocedure photographs were compared.

The procedures were performed after occlusion with local anaesthetic cream (EMLA). The patient had no major discomfort or complications during and after the procedure. Two weeks after the second sitting, the lesions were assessed and it was found that while the lesion on the left side showed some improvement (greater than 50% flattening), the lesion on the right side did not show any significant improvement. However, the left side also showed prominent postinflammatory pigmentary change [Figures 1 and 2]. We would like to conclude that any benefit that Q-switched Nd:YAG laser has on xanthelasma may be dependant on the dose and number of passes per sitting. It is, however, obvious that the more the dose/number of passes, the more the risk of pigmentary changes and scarring. Therefore, the mild benefit obtained is offset by the side-effects, thereby limiting the utility of this modality.

Preprocedure: bilateral xanthelasma below the eyelids
Figure 1
Preprocedure: bilateral xanthelasma below the eyelids
After two sittings of Q-switched ND:YAG laser
Figure 2
After two sittings of Q-switched ND:YAG laser

Two relatively recent studies have shown conflicting results in the context of using Q-switched Nd:YAG in the treatment of xanthelasma. The study by Fusade[1] was the first major study that demonstrated good results in the treatment of xanthelasma palpebrarum with 1,064 nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser. However, a subsequent larger study by Karsai et al.[2] could not replicate a similar good result. Karsai et al. went on to conclude that the treatment of xanthelasma palpebrarum with 1,064 nm Q-switched Nd:YAG LASER cannot be recommended based on the present available evidence.[2]

The perceived advantages of using a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser for xanthelasma palpebrarum would include the avoidance of major side-effects such as atrophy, scars, blisters, hypopigmentation or hyperpigmentation. In vitro studies have shown that fatty tissue can be selectively targeted with laser light of 1,064 nm,[34] but these results refer to subcutaneous tissue containing predominantly triglycerides.[2]

Therefore, while there appears to be a hypothetical basis for the use of Q-switched Nd:YAG laser for xanthelasma palpebrarum, the clinical benefits have not been demonstrated adequately by published data. We would like to agree with the conclusions made by Karsai et al.[2] in suggesting that larger randomized controlled studies with a good design are required to evaluate the efficacy of Q-switched Nd:YAG laser in the treatment of xanthelasma palpebrarum.

REFERENCES

  1. , . Treatment of xanthelasma palpebrarum by 1,064-nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser: A study of 11 cases. Br J Dermatol. 2008;158:84-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . Is Q-Switched Neodymium-Doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser an effective approach to treat xanthelasma palpebrarum? Results from a Clinical Study of 76 Cases. Dermatol Surg. 2009;35:1962-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Histologic evaluation of the pulsed Nd:YAG laser for laser lipolysis. Lasers Surg Med. 2005;36:43-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . Selective photothermolysis of lipid-rich tissues: A free electron laser study. Lasers Surg Med. 2006;38:913-9.
    [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
142

PDF downloads
129
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections