Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Correspondence
10 (
1
); 54-55
doi:
10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_128_15

Reconstruction with Dorsal Nasal Flap after Excision of Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Nose

Department of Surgical Oncology, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India
Department of Pathology, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India

Address for correspondence: Dr. Amitabh Jena, Department of Surgical Oncology, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati - 517 507, Andhra Pradesh, India. E-mail: dramitabh2004@yahoo.co.in

Licence

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Sir,

Reconstruction of nasal defect after excision of a neoplasm is a surgical challenge due to the complex three-dimensional structure involving different components of the nose. Repair of the resultant defect is difficult and should be aesthetically acceptable.[1] The method of repair is based on the defect's size, location and structural involvement (i.e., skin, cartilage, bone, mucosa).[2] Local flaps are preferable as they provide better match for color and texture.[3]

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) of the nose is common with a high recurrence rate. A wide variety of surgical techniques are available which assure complete tumour removal with good aesthetic and functional outcome.[4]

A 72-year-old male presented with a 2 cm × 2 cm ulcer over the dorsum of nose for the last 6 months. Another small, pigmented ulcerated lesion of size 4 mm × 4 mm was present below the right medial canthus [Figure 1]. Dorsal nasal flap was used to reconstruct the resultant defect.

Ulcer over the dorsum of nose
Figure 1
Ulcer over the dorsum of nose

Incision site was marked to include the lesion over the nose. The donor site flap was also designed and marked [Figure 2a]. Wide excision of the nasal skin lesion was done taking 3 mm margin all around. The flap was raised in subcutaneous layer extending to glabella based on the right-sided vascular pedicle [Figure 2b]. The flap was rotated to cover the defect and sutured. The lesion below the right medial canthus was also excised and primary suturing was done [Figure 2c].

(a) lesion over the dorsum of nose and donor flap site marked. (b) defect after excision of lesion and raised dorsal nasal flap. (c) flap was rotated to cover the defect and sutured
Figure 2
(a) lesion over the dorsum of nose and donor flap site marked. (b) defect after excision of lesion and raised dorsal nasal flap. (c) flap was rotated to cover the defect and sutured

All the sutures were removed on the 7th post-operative day [Figure 3a]. Histopathology was reported as BCC. After 2-month follow-up, the patient was asymptomatic with good aesthetic appearance [Figure 3b].

(a) Seventh post-operative day picture after suture removal. (b) Picture after 2 months
Figure 3
(a) Seventh post-operative day picture after suture removal. (b) Picture after 2 months

BCC is the most common non-melanoma skin cancer. It accounts for up to 25%–30% of tumours of the face. The nose has a 2.5 times higher risk of recurrence of BCC after surgical excision due to its anatomical peculiarities and problems in pre-surgical identification of tumour margins. Despite this, surgery is the mainstay of treatment of BCC of the nose.[4]

Cover of nasal defects after cancer-ablative surgeries include numerous reconstructive modalities such as free skin grafting and local flaps.[5]

Dorsal nasal flap (Rieger) is time tested and provides good aesthetic result and is a single-staged procedure. This modified rotation flap recruits redundant skin from the glabella. It can be used to repair skin defects of the nasal tip, dorsum and sidewall. It utilises the entire dorsal nasal skin to facilitate repair. It can repair relatively large lower and mid-nasal defects, measuring 2.5 cm or less with matching adjacent tissue with an exact colour, thickness and contour. It is a safe flap, and the donor site morbidity is minimal. Although originally described to repair the defects of lower third of nose, a little modification can repair the defects of the dorsum of the nose with good outcome.[5] The disadvantage of the flap is limitation regarding size of the defect and the need to elevate an extensive area of nasal tissue.

Our patient had an uneventful post-operative recovery with acceptable cosmetic appearances. Currently, he is doing well.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. , , , . The dorsal nasal flap. Dermatol Clin. 2005;23:73-85, vi.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Nasal reconstruction after basal cell excision. Eplasty. 2013;13:ic10.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . The dorsal nasal flap revisited: aesthetic refinements in nasal reconstruction. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000;2:285-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . Basal cell carcinoma of the outer nose: Overview on surgical techniques and analysis of 312 patients. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2014;7:143-50.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . The nasal glabellar flap. J Otolaryngol. 1994;23:6-7.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections