Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
Consensus Statement
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
EDITORIAL CORRECTION
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Image
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Media & News
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Point of View
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
Consensus Statement
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
EDITORIAL CORRECTION
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Image
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Media & News
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Point of View
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/JCAS_2_2025

Subcutaneous curettage as a treatment modality for axillary hidradenitis suppurativa

Department of Dermatology, Bengaluru Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

*Corresponding author: L. Eswari, Department of Dermatology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India eshwaril@yahoo.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Suresh S, Lavanya L, Gowthami H, Eswari L. Subcutaneous curettage as a treatment modality for axillary hidradenitis suppurativa. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. doi: 10.25259/JCAS_2_2025

Abstract

Objectives:

This study evaluates subcutaneous curettage as a therapeutic option for axillary HS in six patients at a tertiary care centre in Bangalore.

Material and Methods:

The procedure involved tumescence infiltration, curettage of apocrine-rich axillary tissue, and post-operative compression dressing. Patients were monitored using simplified sartorius scoring at baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks.

Results:

Results revealed significant reduction in lesions and improved quality of life.

Conclusion:

The study highlights the efficacy of subcutaneous curettage in mitigating disease progression and recurrence. It underscores the need for further large-scale trials to establish optimized surgical strategies for HS management.

Keywords

Axillary hidradenitis
Dermatosurgery
Follicular occlusion syndrome
Hidradenitis suppurativa
Subcutaneous curettage

INTRODUCTION

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, debilitating disease affecting the young adult population. It is a part of the follicular occlusion syndrome involving the intertriginous areas rich in apocrine glands, such as the axilla, groin, and inframammary area. Painful nodules, abscesses, sinus tract formation, and scarring characterize it.1 HS is more prevalent in females (F: M 4:1).2

It is a relapsing disease of the folliculopilosebaceous units (FPSUs). The follicular unit gets blocked and enlarged by retained keratin due to a myriad of contributing factors, such as smoking, obesity, and genetic and hormonal factors. The damaged FPSU’s ductal contents rupture and leak due to friction, shearing stresses, and pressure, triggering an inflammatory response mostly mediated by the innate immune system.3

Early diagnosis and treatment can lower the chance that HS will deteriorate and proceed to severe stages. Due to the associated discomfort, foul-smelling discharge, and scarring, HS has a dreadful psychosocial impact.4

Management of HS is challenging, with the majority of patients requiring a combination of medical and surgical therapies.5 The early stages can be treated medically, but the latter stages will almost certainly necessitate surgery. Deroofing and local excision is performed for active disease. Certain surgical procedures – such as subcutaneous curettage alleviate the disease process and thus reduce recurrences.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The research comprises a prospective analysis of the disease process and recurrences in six patients who underwent subcutaneous curettage for axillary HS in a tertiary care center in Bangalore.

All patients underwent routine blood investigations and written informed consent was obtained before the start of the procedure. Concurrent systemic medication that maintained remission in each patient was continued. Subcutaneous curettage was done once active lesions were under control. This procedure is aimed at reducing further recurrences and their intensity.

Under aseptic precautions, the axilla was painted and draped. A field block was given with lignocaine 2% with adrenaline 1:2,00,000. Solution for tumescent anesthesia was prepared by adding 100 mL of normal saline, 5 mL of 1% lignocaine, and 0.1 mL of 1:1,000 epinephrine. This solution was infiltrated into the axilla to make it firm and avoid damage to the underlying neurovascular bundle during the procedure.

Apocrine-rich portion of the axilla was marked in a pyriform shape [Figure 1a].

(a) Apocrine rich area marked before procedure. (b) Cannula used for subcutaneous curettage.
Figure 1:
(a) Apocrine rich area marked before procedure. (b) Cannula used for subcutaneous curettage.

A fat aspiration cannula was used for curettage [Figure 1b].

The entry point was made using a Number 11 blade. Cannula was passed into the subcutaneous plane through the entry point, in a to-and-fro motion by the dominant hand and counter pressure was applied over the skin with the non-dominant hand to help guide the tip of the cannula and achieve adequate curettage [Video 1 and Figure 2]. Additional entry points are made if needed to allow curettage of the entire marked area. The endpoint of curettage was ascertained by laxity of skin in the operative field.

Video 1:

Video 1:Procedure.
Cannula passed through the entry point.
Figure 2:
Cannula passed through the entry point.

Following curettage, a compression dressing was applied and changed every alternate day. Patients were prescribed oral diclofenac and antibiotics for 5 days post-procedure. Concurrent systemic medication continued. Compression was maintained for 10 days post-procedure. None of the six patients experienced adverse effects.

Simplified Sartorius score [Table 1] was used to assess the disease on the day of surgery and at follow-up. Patients were followed up at 12-week and 24-week intervals.

Table 1: Simplified sartorius score.
Variables Number x coefficient Total
Nodules 2
Fistulae/sinus tracts 4
Are all lesions separated by normal skin? (yes = 0 point; no = 6 points) 1

RESULTS

Simplified Sartorius score was used to assess disease severity on the day of surgery and at follow-up visits (12 and 24 weeks) [Table 2]. A statistically significant reduction in disease severity was observed in all patients over time [Table 3, Figure 3].

Table 2: Results.
Patient number Score at presentation 12 weeks 24 weeks
1 16 8 2
2 18 6 2
3 24 12 6
4 20 10 4
5 12 6 2
6 20 8 4
Table 3: Paired t-test results.
Comparison Average score before Average score after Mean reduction P-value Significance
Baseline versus Week 12 18.3 8.3 10.0 0.0002 Significant (P<0.001)
Baseline versus Week 24 18.3 3.3 15.0 0.00004 Significant (P<0.001)
(a) At presentation. (b) At 24 weeks. (c) At presentation. (d) At 24 weeks.
Figure 3:
(a) At presentation. (b) At 24 weeks. (c) At presentation. (d) At 24 weeks.

DISCUSSION

The severity of the illness and its subjective effects on each patient should guide therapy choices for HS.6 While medical treatments are advised for this multimodal disease, the standard of care for HS is surgical therapy, which has been demonstrated to be more successful because it ensures full healing of lesions, reduces the recurrence of lesions, and provides long-lasting local disease control. Research on different surgical procedures and reconstructive care has grown exponentially over the past years, offering patients more surgical options.7

Subcutaneous curettage is done to eliminate the “bulge” of the FPSU that houses the stem cells. These cells are implicated in stimulating the growth of the proliferative mass (dermal deposition of amorphous material) and sinus tracts.3 It disrupts the FPSUs responsible for disease perpetuation, offering a less invasive but effective surgical alternative. The technique provides durable results with minimal morbidity, especially when systemic therapy is concurrently used to control active inflammation.

Other surgical modalities for HS include incision and drainage, deroofing, limited or wide local excision, and skin grafting or flap reconstruction. Incision and drainage are typically discouraged due to high recurrence rates. Deroofing and excision offer more definitive management. Wide local excision, although effective in preventing recurrence, may involve significant morbidity and often necessitates complex reconstruction.8 Compared to wide excision, subcutaneous curettage is less invasive, does not require general anesthesia or hospitalization, and can be repeated if needed. Its tissue-sparing nature reduces downtime and improves patient compliance.

Adjunctive treatments such as laser hair reduction have been increasingly incorporated in HS management to reduce follicular occlusion, the initiating event in HS. Laser therapies – particularly long-pulsed neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd: YAG) and diode lasers – have shown reductions in flare frequency and severity. Tierney et al.9 found that long-pulsed Nd: YAG laser therapy led to a significant drop in lesion count and improved patient-reported outcomes. Diode laser therapy has also been found to be effective in reducing recurrence in mild-to-moderate HS.10

The results from this case series suggest that subcutaneous curettage is a promising intervention for axillary HS. Further studies involving larger cohorts and randomized controlled designs are essential to confirm these findings and refine treatment protocols.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates a consistent and statistically significant reduction in lesion scores post-subcutaneous curettage. The greatest improvement in disease severity was observed at 24 weeks. Significant reduction in occurrence of new lesions was observed. Thus, reducing pill-burden and improving quality of life of the patient.

Authors’ contributions:

All the authors contributed equally to the research work.

Ethical approval:

Ethical approval is not required as it is a retrospective evaluation of procedure results and compilation of data.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , , , , et al. What causes hidradenitis suppurativa? Exp Dermatol. 2008;17:455-6. discussion 457-72
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. . Hidradenitis suppurativa. J Cutan Med Sur. 2003;7:47-56.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , . Hidradenitis suppurativa. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;28:1013-27.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . What is hidradenitis suppurativa? Can Fam Physician. 2017;63:114-20.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. . Hidradenitis suppurativa. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009;23:985-98.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . Medical and surgical treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa: A review. Skin Appendage Disord. 2017;3:95-110.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , . A review of surgical and reconstructive techniques for hidradenitis suppurativa. Arch Dermatol Res. 2024;316:270.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , et al. Surgical treatment in hidradenitis suppurativa. J Clin Med. 2022;11:2311.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , . Randomized control trial for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa with a neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser. Dermatol Surg. 2009;35:1188-98.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , . 808 nm diode laser in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa: A retrospective study. Arch Dermatol Res. 2024;316:708.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections