Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
Consensus Statement
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Image
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Point of View
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
Consensus Statement
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Image
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Point of View
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Letter to Editor
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/JCAS_87_2024

Successful hair transplant outcomes in cicatricial alopecia

Department of Dermatology, AK clinics, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.

*Corresponding author: Mukta Sharma, Department of Dermatology, AK Clinics, Ludhiana, Punjab, India. mukta1454@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Sharma M, Dua A, Dua K, Bhardwaj B. Successful hair transplant outcomes in cicatricial alopecia. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. doi: 10.25259/JCAS_87_2024

Dear Editor,

Cicatricial alopecia (CA), or scarring alopecia, represents a rare and challenging group of conditions characterized by irreversible hair follicle destruction and subsequent hair loss. The condition can result from inflammatory, infectious, or traumatic processes and often leads to psychosocial distress due to its disfiguring nature.1 This letter highlights our case series of seven patients who underwent hair transplantation, achieving promising results despite the inherent challenges of CA.

Patients included in our series presented with diverse etiologies of CA, including lichen planopilaris, post-surgical scars from cleft lip repair, and post-traumatic alopecia. All patients underwent comprehensive disease stabilization protocols using a combination of systemic and topical immunomodulatory therapies. The disease inactivity was confirmed through clinical and histopathological evaluations, with stabilization periods ranging from 6 months to 2 years before surgical intervention.

We employed follicular unit extraction (FUE) as the surgical method of choice, as it allows for precise graft harvesting and implantation with minimal scarring, a critical factor in already compromised scalp or facial tissues. In cases with extensive scarring, test patches of 100–150 grafts were implanted to evaluate graft survival. Positive results in test areas, with graft survival rates exceeding 80%, justified proceeding with full-scale transplantation.

The outcomes were highly encouraging. A 36-year-old female with lichen planopilaris achieved 70% scalp coverage after two sessions involving 2,500 grafts [Figure 1]. Similarly, a 45-year-old male undergoing beard reconstruction attained 75% graft survival 6 months post-surgery [Figure 2]. Other patients [Figures 3-5], including those with post-traumatic and post-surgical scarring [Figures 6 and 7], demonstrated graft survival rates between 65% and 86%. Importantly, all patients reported high satisfaction with the cosmetic results, a testament to the meticulous planning and technique employed.

(a) The patient presented with a large area of hair loss. (b) Final results a year later of the last session.
Figure 1:
(a) The patient presented with a large area of hair loss. (b) Final results a year later of the last session.
(a) Pre-operative photographs before undergoing beard transplantation. (b) 1 year after the surgery.
Figure 2:
(a) Pre-operative photographs before undergoing beard transplantation. (b) 1 year after the surgery.
(a) Pre-operative pictures. (b) Immediate post-operative pictures.
Figure 3:
(a) Pre-operative pictures. (b) Immediate post-operative pictures.
(a) Pre-operative photographs during the time of presentation. (b) Eight months after surgery.
Figure 4:
(a) Pre-operative photographs during the time of presentation. (b) Eight months after surgery.
(a) Pre-operative pictures of the patient showing scarring alopecia. (b) Results after 1 year.
Figure 5:
(a) Pre-operative pictures of the patient showing scarring alopecia. (b) Results after 1 year.
(a) Pre-operative pictures showing traumatic scarring alopecia. (b) 8 months after surgery.
Figure 6:
(a) Pre-operative pictures showing traumatic scarring alopecia. (b) 8 months after surgery.
(a) Pre-operative picture. (b) 1 week post-surgery.
Figure 7:
(a) Pre-operative picture. (b) 1 week post-surgery.

This case series underscores several critical considerations for successful outcomes in CA. Stabilization of disease activity remains paramount, as active inflammation compromises graft survival. Histopathological assessments to confirm disease inactivity, as seen in our series, align with recommendations from leading studies.2 The unpredictable vascularity in scarred tissues necessitates careful density modulation, with recipient site densities limited to 15–20 grafts/cm2 in poorly perfused areas. In our cases, densities were adjusted based on individual assessments, ensuring adequate coverage while minimizing ischemic complications [Table 1].

Table 1: Summary of the cases of cicatricial alopecia who underwent transplantation.
Case no. Age/Sex Condition Donor area No. of grafts (test grafts and
total number of grafts implanted)
Technique Growth (%) Outcome
1 36/F Lichen plano pilaris Scalp 100 (test), 2500 FUE 80 (test), 70 Satisfactory coverage with high satisfaction
2 45/M Post-surgical beard alopecia Scalp 2400 FUE 75 Aesthetic improvement, high satisfaction
3 42/M Cicatricial alopecia (since childhood) Beard and scalp 2200 FUE 70 Significant coverage, ongoing improvement
4 32/M Follicular lichen planus Scalp 150 (test), 2200 FUE 80 (test), 86 Full scalp coverage, high satisfaction
5 47/F Lichen plano pilaris (Burnt-out) Scalp 100 (test), 1410 FUE 80 Good cosmetic result, patient satisfied
6 29/M Post-operative upper lip scar Scalp 210 FUE 65 Moderate improvement in scar area
7 25/M Post-traumatic scar (moustache and scalp) Scalp 250 FUE - Planned for future assessment

FUE: Follicular unit extraction, F: Female, M: Male.

Despite these challenges, hair transplantation for CA offers renewed hope for patients, as supported by recent literature reporting graft survival rates of 60–85%.3 Advanced surgical techniques such as FUE, combined with thorough pre-operative planning, are pivotal for achieving satisfactory outcomes. Moreover, staged procedures, as utilized in our series, mitigate the risks of ischemia and ensure optimal healing between sessions.4

In conclusion, hair transplantation in CA, while technically demanding, can yield successful results with proper stabilization, surgical precision, and patient counseling. The outcomes of our series contribute valuable insights into managing this challenging condition and highlight the transformative impact of such interventions on patient quality of life.

Acknowledgments:

We thank the patients for their consent to share these experiences. There are no conflicts of interest or funding disclosures.

Authors’ contributions:

Mukta Sharma: Wrote the manuscript and reviewed literature. Aman Dua, Kapil Dua, Bhawna Bhardwaj: Involved in concept, manuscript editing, guidance, conducting the cases and approval of the final version of the manuscript.

Ethical approval:

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. . Cicatricial alopecia: Clinico-pathological findings and treatment. Clin Dermatol. 2001;19:211-25.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . The assessment of Hair transplantation outcomes in cicatricial alopecia. Int J Trichology. 2020;12:164-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . The surgical treatment of cicatricial alopecia. Dermatol Ther. 2008;21:295-311.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Hair transplantation in the cicatricial alopecias. Hair Ther Transplant. 2013;3:109.
    [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
93

PDF downloads
12
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections