Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Innovations
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/jcas_53_21

Surgical pearl: Use of micropore tape for easy harvestation and transfer of suction blister epidermal graft

Department of Dermatology, Mukhtar Skin Centre, Katihar Medical College Road, Katihar, Bihar, India.

*Corresponding author: Muhammed Mukhtar, Department of Dermatology, Mukhtar Skin Centre, Katihar Medical College Road, Katihar, Bihar, India. drmmukhtar20@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Mukhtar M. Surgical pearl: Use of micropore tape for easy harvestation and transfer of suction blister epidermal graft. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. doi: 10.25259/jcas_53_21

Abstract

Epidermal graft produced by suction is useful in treating vitiligo. However, it is very difficult to handle thin, flimsy, and translucent epidermis due to its in-curling and wrinkling properties. This is due to the hemispherical blister roof surface area which is twice its circular base. The correction of the epidermal surface and its resizing is a cumbersome and time-consuming task during epidermal grafting. To combat these problems, the blister roof is patched with micropore adhesive tape as a novel technique for harvestation and transfer of the suction blister graft.

Keywords

Epidermis
Hemisphere
Incurling
Micropore
Mosquito artery forceps
Perifollicular pigmentation
Diffuse pigmentation

PROBLEM STATEMENT

Epidermal graft produced by suction is useful in treating vitiligo. However, it is very difficult to handle a thin, flimsy, and translucent epidermis due to its in-curling and wrinkling properties like a deflated balloon. This is due to the hemispherical fibrinous blister roof, whose surface area is twice its circular base. The correction, identification of the epidermal surface, and its resizing are cumbersome and time-consuming tasks during epidermal grafting.1,2 To combat these problems, the blister roof is patched with micropore adhesive tape as a novel technique for harvestation and transfer of the suction blister graft.

RECOMMENDED SOLUTION

The blister roof is halved into two parts with the help of small scissors or a blade. The blister fluid is drained out. Subsequently, half of the graft is spread out well on its base to make it anti-curled and anti-wrinkled with the help of small mosquito forceps. Then, a piece of micropore tape is patched 1 on half of the graft. Following this, the mosquito forceps are inserted in the blister cavity to stretch out gently its margin, and then, the incised margin of the graft is held with the forceps to detach from its base completely [Figure 1a-d]. The same procedure was repeated to detach the second half of the graft. During the procedure, the tape was kept dry for better adhesiveness of the tape on the graft. The tape gives strength to the delicate graft and prevents the graft from getting torn. After harvestation, the epidermis remained uncurled and unwrinkled. This graft can be resized into any size and shape. There is no problem with surface identification, in-curling, and anti-wrinkling of the graft. The graft could be handled, transferred, or transported easily from the donor with the help of a forceps. Here, it is easily harvested, lifted, and re-grafted over the donor site. The taking of the graft does not interfere with the patching of tape which could be seen as the difference in the pattern of pigmentation (perifollicular vs. diffuse) without and with epidermal re-grafting over the donor site [Figure 2a and b]. Extra tape can be trimmed before grafting. There is no significant loss of graft on the margin and no incidence of secondary bacterial infection on a clean grafted wound.3

(a-d) The different stages of harvestation of the first half of the graft.
Figure 1:
(a-d) The different stages of harvestation of the first half of the graft.
(a) The pigmentation of donor sites without epidermal grafting showing patchy and perifollicular pigmentation and (b) diffuse pigmentation after epidermal grafting.
Figure 2:
(a) The pigmentation of donor sites without epidermal grafting showing patchy and perifollicular pigmentation and (b) diffuse pigmentation after epidermal grafting.

Authors’ contributions

All works related to this article are done by the author.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board Approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The author confirms that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

References

  1. , . Resizing blister roof grafts for vitiligo surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71:e39-40.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Surgical pearl: Gloved finger as a transport platform for epidermal graft of suction blister. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57:S118-9.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . A retrospective comparison of 3M Micropore with other common dressings in cosmetic breast surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019;72:424-6.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections