Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Correspondence
10 (
4
); 228-230
doi:
10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_91_17

Thread Lift in Breast Ptosis

Mehektagul Dermaclinic, New Delhi, India
Department of Dermatology, Command Hospital Air Force, Bengaluru, India

Address for correspondence: Dr. Sandeep Arora, Department of Dermatology, Command Hospital Air Force, Bangalore 560007, India. E-mail: aroraderma@gmail.com

Licence

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Sir,

Female breast ptosis is a consequence of aging. An ideal esthetic nipple lies between 5 and 7cm above the inferior mammary crease in a non-augmented breast. Progressive resting of the gland against the rib cage reflects ptosis. History of significant (50 lbs.) weight loss, higher body mass index (BMI), larger bra cup size, number of pregnancies, and smoking have been described as the significant risk factors for breast ptosis.[1] It is also one of the most common conditions treated by reconstructive surgeons.[2] However, surgical breast reconstructions have their attended surgical risks and associated morbidity, which may be avoidable in lean, younger females, and those with lesser degree of ptosis or mild breast asymmetry. Polydioxanone thread lift (PDOT) offers an alternative to those not desirous of surgery and can also be used as an add-on treatment after surgery for finer correction. It is well established in face-lift procedures; however, literature on breast ptosis use is lacking.[3]

Female patients seeking correction of breast ptosis between January and December 2016 at a dermatology center were selected for management with PDOT (monofilaments, 90mm). Those who were seeking breast volume augmentation, with severe obesity (BMI >40kg/m2), ptosis of grade 3, breast cup size >3, pregnant, and lactating, and those with a history of keloids were excluded. All selected patients underwent a breast examination to rule out preexisting breast disease, were assessed for degree of ptosis as per Regnault ptosis scale [Figure 1] and photographed before and after the procedure, and upon follow-up at 6 months after undergoing PDOT.[4] Preexisting breast disease or any abnormality during the examination was considered contraindication for the procedure. Eutectic mixture of prilocaine and lidocaine was used as a local anesthetic for a period of 1h prior to PDOT under aseptic precautions. We used crosshatch technique for upper pole fullness and inferior to nipple areolar complex, overlapping linear threading for lift along vectors directed at an angle against gravity as well as circular insertion in upper pole for firmness and shaping (scaffolding) [Figure 2]. Posttreatment, all were advised a supportive brassiere for 2 weeks. Patients’ response to treatment was also recorded according to visual analog scale (VAS) (4+, >75% improvement; 3+, 50–75% improvement; 2+, 25–50% improvement; 1+, 0–25% improvement; and no response).

Regnault ptosis classification; (A) normal, (B) type 1: mild sagging, (C) type 2: moderate sagging, (D) type 3: severe sagging, (E) pseudoptosis: lower breast sagging. *Inferior mammary crease
Figure 1
Regnault ptosis classification; (A) normal, (B) type 1: mild sagging, (C) type 2: moderate sagging, (D) type 3: severe sagging, (E) pseudoptosis: lower breast sagging. *Inferior mammary crease
PDOT insertion techniques used: (A) crosshatch below nipple areolar complex, (B) scaffolding, (C) crosshatch at upper pole
Figure 2
PDOT insertion techniques used: (A) crosshatch below nipple areolar complex, (B) scaffolding, (C) crosshatch at upper pole

Ten female patients underwent PDOT insertion and were followed up till 6 months after procedure. The mean pre-procedure ptosis degree was 2.3 and post-procedure was 0.7 [Table 1]. This was statistically significant (P = 0.0002). Eight cases (80%) were satisfied with the procedure outcome (VAS 3+) and one each achieved VAS 2+ and 1+. All were satisfied with the upper pole fullness. Post-procedure bruising was seen as a sequela. No other complications were observed [Figure 3].

Table 1 Comparison of pre- and posttreatment parameters
Pre-procedure (top row) and post-procedure (bottom row) of (A) Case 1, (B) Case 3, (C) Case 7, (D) Case 10
Figure 3
Pre-procedure (top row) and post-procedure (bottom row) of (A) Case 1, (B) Case 3, (C) Case 7, (D) Case 10

Polydioxanone absorbable threads produce instant result, which improves over the initial few weeks, and may last for up to 2 years.[5] Scaffolding, as elaborated earlier, has not been described earlier in thread lift. It provides a better lift for the larger breast volume and its effect lasts longer, as threads are inserted at an angle to the vertical gravity effect, with crossed threads helping in laying down a collagen matrix. Circumferential insertion ensures upper pole definition. As per our experience, a repeat session is needed after 12–15 months.

PDOT is reported to work by stimulating neo-angiogenesis, collagen stimulation, and fibroblast stimulation, which further improves skin texture.[6] The procedure needs considerable expertise with patient selection, correct vector determination, a correct insertion plane within ligaments of Cooper, and repeat sessions to maintain effect as with other esthetic procedures like botulinum toxin. It is an established treatment modality for face lift and asymmetry correction, with the advantage of a short duration of administration and minimal downtime and discomfort. For these reasons it can also be used for correction of breast ptosis (grade <3), breast asymmetry and used in breast shaping without surgery or general anesthesia.[7] Use of PDOT as a material is justified in breast ptosis, as it is an established suture with high-tensile strength used already in general orthopedic surgery; ocular, gastrointestinal tract, cardiovascular surgery; and general surgery; and gets absorbed in 6 months with no additional suture complication or chance of malignancy.[89]

Presentation at a meeting

12th World Congress of Cosmetic Dermatology 2017 (WCOCD) Organization Association of Cutaneous Surgeons of India, Bengaluru, 4–6 May 2017.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflict of interest

None.

REFERENCES

  1. , , , . Breast ptosis: Causes and cure. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64:579-84.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons 2008 Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank. New York, NY: ASAPS Communications Office; . p. :7.
  3. , . Two years’ outcome of thread lifting with absorbable barbed PDO threads: Innovative score for objective and subjective assessment. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2017;1:1-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , . Breast ptosis. Definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg. 1976;3:193-203.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Lifting the breast with PDO threads. . Aesthetics [Internet]. Available from: https://aestheticsjournal.com/feature/lifting-the-breast-with-pdo-threads
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . Outcomes of polydioxanone knotless thread lifting for facial rejuvenation. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41:720-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , . Barbed sutures in aesthetic plastic surgery: Evolution of thought and process. Aesthet Surg J. 2013;33(Suppl 1):17-31.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Studies on the efficacy and safety of polydioxanone monofilament absorbable suture. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1983;156:51-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , . Absorbable polydioxanone (PDS) suture provides fewer wound complications than polyester (ethibond) suture in acute tendo-achilles rupture repair. Ir Med J. 2017;110:566.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections