Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Innovations
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/jcas_2_24

Trypsinized suction blister

Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.

*Corresponding author: Suman Patra, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India. patrohere@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Patra S, Kumar S, Kaur M. Trypsinized suction blister. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. doi: 10.25259/jcas_2_24

Abstract

Suction blister epidermal grafting (SBEG) is a standard technique for treating vitiligo on challenging areas like fingertips and lips but often results in pigment halos and difficulties with small, curved surfaces. We propose a modified SBEG technique, utilizing trypsinization of one blister graft to improve melanocyte spread and reduce peri-graft halo. Trypsin ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution is introduced into a selected blister, creating a cell suspension applied to dermabraded gaps and peripheries, including eyelid margins. At 5-month follow-up, complete re-pigmentation with no halo effect was achieved, indicating this modified approach’s potential in enhancing SBEG outcomes for complex sites.

Keywords

Suction blister grafting
Trypsinized modification of suction blister grafting (SBG)
Perigraft halo

PROBLEM STATEMENT

Suction blister epidermal grafting is a well-established surgical technique for vitiligo.1 It is preferred over cellular grafts for fingertip and lip lesions due to its ease to perform over rounded and uneven surfaces. Its main limitation remains lack of spread of the engrafted melanocytes leading to halo around each graft. It has difficulty in re-pigmenting the eyelid margins and angle of mouth due to size of the graft and difficulty to apply it over small, curved surfaces.2

RECOMMENDED SOLUTION

We propose a modification of suction blister epidermal graft (SBEG) by trypsinization of one of the blister grafts to overcome the obstacle of pigment spread and minimize peri graft halo.

One of the blisters made for SBEG is chosen and blister fluid is aspirated through an 1 cc syringe attached to a 26G needle puncturing the blister through its floor. Equal amount of trypsin ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution is injected into the blister by the same needle and kept for 25–30 min. Then, the trypsin EDTA solution is aspirated completely. The graft is obtained by harvesting the roof of the blister over a glass slide. Apart from the blister graft, turbid fluid also comes out from the dermal side of the blister graft containing cell suspension [Video 1]. Over the dermabraded recipient area following application of rest of the blister grafts, the cell suspension is applied over the gaps between the grafts and also over the periphery (including the eyelid margin in our case). Dressing and subsequent care are similar to SBEG procedures. Complete re-pigmentation was achieved over the lesion including eyelid margin at 5th-month follow-up with no peri-graft halo [Figure 1a and b].

Video 1:

Video 1:Technique of trypsinized suction blister grafting.
(a) Pre-treatment photograph of the vitiligo lesion over upper eyelid, (b) Post-treatment photograph after 5 months with complete repigmentation including the eyelid margin.
Figure 1:
(a) Pre-treatment photograph of the vitiligo lesion over upper eyelid, (b) Post-treatment photograph after 5 months with complete repigmentation including the eyelid margin.

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed equally during the process of surgery and drafting the same for publication.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Video available on:

https://jcasonline.com/

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

References

  1. , , . Suction blister grafting for vitiligo: Efficacy and clinical predictive factors. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41:633-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . Comparison between autologous noncultured epidermal cell suspension and suction blister epidermal grafting in stable vitiligo: A randomized study. Br J Dermatol. 2012;167:1295-301.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections