Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

CASE REPORT
4 (
3
); 211-213
doi:
10.4103/0974-2077.91257

Ulcerated Infantile Haemangioma of Leg Successfully Treated with Propranolol

Department of Pediatric Dermatology, KK Child's Trust Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Department of Dermatology, Stanley Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Address for correspondence: Dr. Jayakar Thomas, 135, East Madha Church Road, Royapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. E-mail: jayakarthomas@gmail.com

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Infantile haemangioma (IH) frequently requires no intervention. Eighty percent of IHs are focal and solitary. Fifteen percent of cutaneous haemangiomas occur on the extremities. A large size or a specific location or both may carry complications such as ulceration which is one of the main complications, and active treatment is usually required to manage pain, potential scarring, and occasionally, bleeding and infection. Oral propanolol is used in the treatment of IH and is found to be an effective treatment for complicated IH, replacing systemic corticosteroids as first-line therapy. Recommendations for instituting treatment with propranolol in infants differ among different specialties and academic centres. We report an infant with ulcerated IH of leg who responded dramatically to treatment with propranolol in 4 months.

Keywords

Haemangioma
infancy
propranolol
ulcerated infantile haemangioma

INTRODUCTION

Infantile haemangiomas (IHs) are the most common benign vascular tumours of infancy.

Ulceration is a major cause of morbidity in IHs. They occur in up to 13% of cases. Propranolol, a lipophilic, nonselective beta-blocker, by causing vasoconstriction, inhibition of angiogenesis and induction of apoptosis induces a sustained response in IH. The drug should be instituted with careful monitoring preferably under supervision of a paediatric cardiologist. The response of ulcerated IH to propranolol is good and promising keeping in mind the potentially harmful side effects such as hypoglycaemia, bronchospasm and hypotension.[12]

CASE REPORT

A 4-month-old female child presented with haemangioma since birth, involving the left lower leg near the ankle, with ulceration for the past 2 months. The infant was admitted. After complete evaluation in conjunction with the cardiologist that involved pretreatment cardiac workup and an in-hospital titration of propranolol, the infant was given oral propranolol following the standard treatment protocol.[3] A course of an oral antibiotic was given for a period of 1 week before starting treatment with propranolol. The infant was carefully monitored for systemic side effects. Propranolol was given as an oral liquid (1 mg/mL), at an initial dose of 1 mg/kg daily divided into three equal doses and increased to 2 mg/kg daily after 1 week. The infant was monitored for a 4-h period in hospital after the first dose and 1 week later when the dose was increased. During the 4-h period, the heart rate and blood pressure were monitored every 30 min. For the first 2 weeks, the heart rate and blood pressure were checked twice weekly and thereafter once weekly on a shared-care basis with the paediatric team.

The child was admitted for every dose of propranolol. The response was slow till the 12th week. However, during the subsequent visit, there was a significant reduction in the size with a change in the colour and texture of the lesion. The lesion healed with an atrophic scar at the site of ulceration [Figures 13]. Medication was continued for a further period of 2 months and then stopped. The child is being followed up and there has been no recurrence in the past 6 months.

IH treated with propranolol, pretreatment
Figure 1
IH treated with propranolol, pretreatment
IH, 2 months after the initiation of treatment
Figure 2
IH, 2 months after the initiation of treatment
IH, 4 months after the initiation of treatment
Figure 3
IH, 4 months after the initiation of treatment

DISCUSSION

Ulcerated haemangiomas are often painful in infants; they incur risk of local or systemic infection and can lead to permanent, unsightly scars. In a retrospective observational study, of ulcerated IHs treated with propranolol, lower limb affection was seen in only 3%.[4] Propranolol is a highly effective and safe new treatment modality for those infants who failed to respond to steroids, and those with complications like ulceration as in our case. However, propranolol is contraindicated and should be used with caution in large haemangiomas. Infants with diffuse (miliary) haemangiomatosis are at risk for high-output cardiac compromise. Infants with a renal or hepatic dysfunction, underlying cardiovascular disease, asthma, diabetes or glaucoma are not ideal for propranolol. The potential side effects like bradycardia, hypotension and hypoglycaemia which can lead to long-term neurologic sequelae should be kept in mind. Ulcerated haemangiomas require treatment independent of their localization or any functional discomfort. The striking effect of propranolol on growing IH can be attributed to three molecular mechanisms: vasoconstriction, inhibition of angiogenesis (reduced expression of vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF], basic fibroblast growth factor [bFGF], hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha [fHIF-1amatrix metalloproteinase [MMP]) and induction of apoptosis. They correspond to early (brightening of the haemangioma surface), intermediate (growth arrest; [Figure 2]) and long-term (regression, [Figure 3]) clinical observations.[5] Atenolol is a promising alternative to propranolol for the treatment of haemangiomas as it is less likely to produce pulmonary side effects.[6] Our case confirms the success of therapy with propranolol for ulcerated infantile haemangioma. We found no side-effects with propranolol. Propranolol when used with proper pre-assessment and monitoring appears to be a promising drug in the treatment of even ulcerated haemangioma where steroids may delay wound healing.

CONCLUSION

Propranolol is a highly effective and safe new treatment modality for ulcerated IHs in infants, as in our case. Though ulcerated haemangioma of the leg is rare in infants, it is a cause for morbidity in a growing child. This is probably the first report in India where ulcerated IH on the leg was successfully treated with propranolol. We conclude that amongst the armamentarium of available therapeutic options, propranolol when used with proper monitoring appears to be a promising drug in the treatment of even ulcerated haemangioma.

Source of Support: Nil.

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

REFERENCES

  1. , , , , , , . Adverse effects of propranolol when used in the treatment of hemangiomas: A case series of 28 infants. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65:320-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , . Propranolol in rapidly growing hemangiomas. Eur J Pediatr Dermatol. 2008;18:185-92.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Propranolol for complicated infantile haemangiomas: A case series of 30 infants. Br J Dermatol. 2010;162:466-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . Propranolol for treatment of ulcerated infantile hemangiomas. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;64:827-32.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Propranolol for infantile haemangiomas: Insights into the molecular mechanisms of action. Br J Dermatol. 2010;163:269-74.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . Atenolol: A promising alternative to propranolol for the treatment of hemangiomas. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65:420-1.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections