Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Correspondence
11 (
2
); 98-99
doi:
10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_32_18

A Simple, Efficient, and Economical Head Drape Technique for Facial Procedures: The Nun’s Veil Drape

Consultant plastic surgeon (Fixed term), North Bristol NHS Trust, Former senior microsurgical fellow, Queen Victoria hospital NHS F Trust

Address for correspondence: Dr. Guirgis Arsanios Awad, Plastic surgery Department, Brunel’s building, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS105NB. E-mail: guirgis.awad@gmail.com

Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Sir/Madam,

Keratinocyte carcinomas, specifically basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), represent the most frequently observed malignancy among Caucasians. In individuals with fair skin, approximately 75%–80% of these malignancies are BCCs and up to 25% are SCCs. In the majority of the population, light skin complexion and history of ultraviolet light exposure are the predominant risk factors for BCC. The incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancers has been rising over the past three decades.[12]

Clinically, BCC, SCC, and actinic keratosis are most commonly found on the head and neck region, though any part of the body can be affected. We operate on large numbers of patients with skin lesions (skin cancer and nonskin cancer) of the head and neck at Queen Victoria Hospital in East Grinstead, West Sussex, United Kingdom, as well as at other peripheral hospitals. Such procedures are usually performed under local anesthesia ± sedation. The common practice in our unit is to use a turban head drape 115×127cm as well as a single 90×90cm drape. Unfortunately, many times this slips off, exposing hair, which was not necessarily prepped or which becomes an irritant in the operative field. Also at the peripheral hospitals, the head drapes are not necessarily available.

Hence, we have been using a fenestrated drape, which fenestration is modified (trimmed) to fit the face, in a nun’s veil manner [Figures 1 and 2]. We keep only a couple of millimeters of the sticky part along the rim except for the lower corner that will fit under the chin, which sticky part is completely cut out. This modified drape very gently and minimally sticks to the face and is very easily removed as well [Figures 35]. The modified opening can be adjusted to include the ear for operations on the ear and for harvesting preauricular skin grafts. Extra space is easily achieved by release of the lower corner that fits under the chin and needs not to be too tight.

Nun’s veil drape used for upper lip lesion excision procedure
Figure 1
Nun’s veil drape used for upper lip lesion excision procedure
Nun’s veil drape
Figure 2
Nun’s veil drape
Steps for preparing the fenestrated drape before application
Figure 3
Steps for preparing the fenestrated drape before application
Modifying the fenestrated drape
Figure 4
Modifying the fenestrated drape
Modifying the fenestrated drape
Figure 5
Modifying the fenestrated drape

We have been using this simple draping technique in more than 100 cases of excisions and/or reconstruction of the face regions (nose, ears, eyelids, lips, cheeks, chin, forehead, and temples). It has proven very efficient and time-saving due to the ease of use and application, as well as only exposing the face region (required surgical field) and yet being patient friendly.

We also looked at the costs of different draping systems and found out that a head turban drape 115×127cm costs £4.07 and a 90×90cm absorbent drape costs £2.32, whereas 90×90cm single drape costs £0.84. On the other hand, the fenestrated drape 112×120cm costs £1.61. Although this only saves £3.3 [(4.07+0.84) − 1.61] per procedure (about 67% of the drapes costs), nevertheless it will provide a reasonable means of savings owing to the very high volume of cases performed per year (using the code S06.5 for excision of lesion of skin of head or neck, 1139 procedures were performed in our unit in 2017). Hence, we are standardizing this draping system for excision and reconstruction of skin lesions of the face. We believe this technique could be very helpful for facial surgical procedures, both office based and theatres based. Turban head draping has been commonly used. Gulati et al.[3] described using two additional orthopedic extremity plastic cutoff drapes with adhesive edges to secure the hair. Other techniques have been published for head drapes, which include a modification of turban head drapes using sticking drapes.[45] We believe our technique is a novel one. It is simple, but yet time efficient, effective, patient friendly, and economical.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. , , , , , , . Non-melanoma skin cancer in Australia: the 2002 national survey and trends since 1985. Med J Aust. 2006;13:6-10.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . Incidence estimate of nonmelanoma skin cancer (keratinocyte carcinomas) in the U.S. Population, 2012. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;13:1081-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , . A simple technique to control the hair and enhance draping for major head and neck surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;13:181-2.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . Head-draping technique for office-based procedures. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;13:e155-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . A novel head drape technique. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009;13:716.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections