Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
Consensus Statement
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Image
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Point of View
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
Consensus Statement
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Image
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Point of View
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Practice Points
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/JCAS_150_2024

A resident’s guide to skin cancer minor surgery

Department of Plastic Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom.

*Corresponding author: Celine Jose, Department of Plastic Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom. celinejose.3@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Jose C, Asher CM. A resident’s guide to skin cancer minor surgery. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. doi: 10.25259/JCAS_150_2024

Abstract

Local anesthetic skin cancer surgery is essential diagnostically and therapeutically in dermatology and plastic surgery. Proper training requires vigilant oncological control and the implementation of optimal reconstructive principles. This article illustrates key principles of the surgical approach to resection and reconstruction of a skin cancer defect. These techniques aim to optimize patient comfort, reduce the risk of inadvertent oncological compromise and highlight approaches to reconstruction in different anatomical areas. Local anesthetic skin cancer surgery is essential in the treatment of skin cancer. It also offers an opportunity for even the most junior resident doctors to perform minor procedures. Improved understanding of ways to maintain oncological control and how to approach reconstruction in different anatomical areas is essential to optimizing patient-centered outcomes and improving the confidence of those performing the surgery.

Keywords

Minor procedure
Scar orientation
Skin cancer
Skin surgery

INTRODUCTION

Local anesthetic lists are a daily facility within skin cancer units in the United Kingdom (UK) and are an excellent training opportunity for even the most junior resident doctors.1 There are an estimated 22,000 cancer patients, including those with skin cancer, awaiting appointments according to Cancer Research UK,2 so the expanded use of residents to participate in the diagnosis and treatment of skin cancer is an avenue worth exploring.

Despite their ambitious aims to deal with the more complex skin cancer and reconstructive cases, residents in dermatology and plastic surgery need to have a solid foundation of basic surgical skills in the context of oncological surgery when conducting even the simplest of cases.

COMMON SKIN CANCERS

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is a common and slow-growing, locally invasive skin cancer with a low risk of metastasis.3 It typically appears as pearly or translucent nodules with telangiectasia on sun-exposed areas.

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) carries a higher risk of metastasis and typically presents as keratotic nodules with a central crater of crust with a shorter period of growth.3

Melanoma leans toward the more aggressive end of the spectrum of skin cancers arising from melanocytes. They typically have a pigmented appearance with irregular borders and color distribution. Potential symptoms include itching, bleeding, or simply a sudden change in the appearance of a preexisting mole. It can progress quickly and has high metastatic potential.4

Early diagnosis and treatment of skin cancer is crucial for reducing morbidity, mortality, and recurrence rates. Patients often need ongoing follow-up in the community or under a member of the skin cancer multidisciplinary team due to likely actinic field change posing the risk of further skin cancers. Surgery is often the first-line treatment for many skin cancers because it facilitates histological diagnosis and offers definitive treatment.

There are several definitions that residents need to appreciate.

DEFINITIONS

Diagnostic excision biopsy

An excision of the entirety of the lesion with a 1–2 mm margin of normal surrounding skin and a cuff of fat.5

Mark the lesion, including the surrounding unstable skin, and mark the excision margin before local anesthetic administration.

Therapeutic excision biopsy

This is a therapeutic excision with the intent to treat and, therefore, reduce the risk of local recurrence. However, it is based on a clinical diagnosis without prior histological diagnosis.

Excision margins will vary depending on the lesion and can be facilitated by guidelines.6,7 As this is based on a clinical diagnosis, it typically applies to three categories of skin lesions:

Benign but symptomatic

Excise with a 2 mm margin and a cuff of fat.

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC)

A typical, nodular, and well-defined BCC is excised with a 4 mm margin and a cuff of fat, high-risk lesions with a 5 mm margin, with fat, to the next tissue plane, which is clinically normal.6

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)

These are usually excised with a 4 mm, 6 mm, or 1 cm peripheral margin, down to the fascia, depending on features of aggression. Where reconstruction necessitates a skin graft or flap, consider excision to a deeper plane to minimize the risk of an incomplete deep margin requiring re-excision including the reconstructive tissue. For example, excision to periosteum on the scalp instead of the galea aponeurotica in a mobile, but exophytic clinical SCC which will require a graft.7

The intention of treatment is to obtain clearance and reduce the risk of recurrence. Oncologically, this means obtaining a minimum of 1–2 mm (1 mm for SCC,7 1 mm for nodular BCC, and >2 mm for other histological types of BCC6) from the nearest histologically detected cancer. This results in a 92–95% rate of clearance and a 17–22% reduced rate of reoccurrence.6 A sound clinical assessment of the margins of clinically abnormal skin is best performed with the aid of magnification—using a dermatoscope or surgical loupes and a good-quality light source.6,8 A high index of suspicion for neurovascular invasion or fixity to underlying structures should be considered.

Where melanoma is suspected, a diagnostic excision, as outlined earlier, is performed in the first instance to obtain a Breslow thickness before proceeding with a therapeutic excision.9

LOCAL ANESTHESIA ADMINISTRATION

Inject your local anesthetic in parallel to sensory nerve orientation, giving this 1st injection a moment to work before administering the remainder.10 Subsequent injections should be less sensitive. Avoid injecting into the skin lesion directly, reducing the theoretical risk of seeding potential tumors elsewhere [Figure 1].

Administering local anesthetic agent in the direction of sensory nerve.
Figure 1:
Administering local anesthetic agent in the direction of sensory nerve.

As you inject, observe if the lesion elevates off underlying structures (fascia/bone) or if it remains fixed. Depending on anatomical location and defect size, fixity may increase the complexity of the reconstruction required.

When using adrenaline, allow its hemostatic effects to have time to work. Consider administering the injection, drafting your paperwork, and then scrubbing for the case. This will reduce the tendency to start before it has had any hemostatic effect while maintaining some operative efficiency.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Good oncological practice requires you to obtain a specimen that is histologically examinable and uncrushed without contamination of neighboring skin. Techniques to uphold this include:

  1. Use of a different needle for injection of local anesthetic for each skin cancer being excised on the same patient

  2. Skin preparation of normal skin first, then the cancer site; the reverse will seed “dirty” to clean

  3. Avoid overhandling the specimen with forceps; a skin hook for retraction may be less traumatizing11

  4. Avoid gauze used for absorbing blood also brushing the cancer and then resting on normal skin

  5. Remove instruments used for excision and use fresh instruments and gauze for closure of skin

  6. Where multiple tumors are being excised, use a fresh suture for each closure. The leftover of one suture can be used for the marker suture; a clip can be placed on the specimen for orientation until the marker suture is placed

SCAR ORIENTATION WITH ANATOMICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Limbs

Where possible, mark your elliptical extension in a vertical orientation. Laxity is circumferential, lymphatics run longitudinally, so you preserve more this way, reducing edema. If subsequent excision and reconstruction are required, a vertical orientation is usually favorable [Figure 2].12

(a) Skin lesion marked, (b) marking the lesion to make a longitudinal orientation drawing maximum laxity, (c) excision margins marked with edges touching the ellipse, (d) post-excision of lesion – longitudinally oriented scar.
Figure 2:
(a) Skin lesion marked, (b) marking the lesion to make a longitudinal orientation drawing maximum laxity, (c) excision margins marked with edges touching the ellipse, (d) post-excision of lesion – longitudinally oriented scar.

Face

Mark the margins, usually circular, and excise as a circle in the first instance. Skin is elastic, and the orientation of the different muscle fibers of the face often allows you to draw laxity from different directions to support closure without an ellipse. Any excess skin that creates a standing cone (dog ear) can be removed at the end, often a smaller (burrows) triangle than your predicted pre-marked ellipse [Figure 3].

Skin lesion marked with edges making a circle.
Figure 3:
Skin lesion marked with edges making a circle.

Post-auricular

Tumors within the post-auricular sulcus can be amenable to direct closure by advancing skin from the posterior ear, creating an effect similar to pinnaplasty. However, if you suspect an invasive tumor, it may be preferable to place a skin graft here. This will facilitate earlier identification of a reoccurrence in an anatomical area with an invasive path that can extend to the base of the skull.

Lower lid

A vertical orientation is more favorable to a transverse scar. The latter has a greater risk of causing ectropion [Figure 4].

Skin lesion marked, (b) post-excision of skin lesion – vertically oriented surgical wound.
Figure 4:
Skin lesion marked, (b) post-excision of skin lesion – vertically oriented surgical wound.

Trunk

Assess the direction of the Resting Skin Tension Lines (RSTLs). Mark the lesion’s margins, and extend this into an ellipse into these RSTLs. Consider the movements that will put this wound under the most tension. The closure needs to withstand this [Figure 5].

(a) Edges of skin lesion marked, (b) marking with adequate excision margin, (c) making an ellipse in the direction of resting skin tension line, (d) post-excision of lesion
Figure 5:
(a) Edges of skin lesion marked, (b) marking with adequate excision margin, (c) making an ellipse in the direction of resting skin tension line, (d) post-excision of lesion

Mohs surgery

Mohs micrographic surgery is advantageous for lesions on the face, where tissues are often not in excess for reconstruction but routine excision poses the risk of high morbidities, such as in the periocular and nasal regions, and with poorly defined or histologically aggressive skin cancers such as morphoeic, micronodular and infiltrative BCCs, and recurrent tumors.13

It offers the advantage of a targeted, complete excision before reconstruction, without significant delay between diagnosis and treatment, with greater preservation of histologically uninvolved skin.14

LEARNING POINTS

  1. The intent of the procedure, diagnostic or therapeutic, determines the margin for excision.

  2. Give local anesthetic with consideration to the direction of sensory nerves.

  3. Sound oncological surgical practice will prevent the risk of tumor seeding to the local area.

  4. The orientation of scars should be optimized to the anatomical site and local structures 5. Mohs micrographic surgery should be actively considered for high-risk cases.

CONCLUSION

Skin cancer minor surgery provides a valuable training ground for junior residents to develop essential procedural skills within the context of oncological care. A sound understanding of excision principles, appropriate anesthetic techniques and lesion handling is key to achieving clear margins and reducing the risk of recurrence. Careful planning of scar orientation, appropriate margin selection and clear documentation support both patient outcome and clinical learning. Early exposure to structured techniques lays a strong foundation for future practice in skin cancer surgery.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: Christian Marlon Asher, Methodology: Celine Jose, Resources: Christian Marlon Asher (Lead), Celine Jose (equal), Supervision: Christian Marlon Asher, Writing – original draft: Christian Marlon Asher (lead), Celine Jose (supporting), Writing – review & editing: Celine Jose (lead), Christian Marlon Asher (supporting).

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , . Core training and surgical opportunities: A UK-based analysis. J Clin Transl Res. 2022;8:557-62.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. . Cancer waiting times report 2023. . NHS England. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/cancer-waiting-times [Last accessed on 2024 Oct 08]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. . Dermatology handbook for registrars, updated edition . Available from: https://cdn.bad.org.uk/uploads/2022/08/24112653/dermatology-handbook-for-registrars-2022.pdf [Last accessed on 2025 Jan 20]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . A review of epidemiology and cancer biology of malignant melanoma. Cureus. 2021;13:e15087.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Biopsy for malignant melanoma-are we following the guidelines? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008;90:322-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , et al. British Association of Dermatologists guidelines for the management of adults with basal cell carcinoma 2021. Br J Dermatol. 2021;185:899-920.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , et al. British Association of Dermatologists guidelines for the management of people with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma 2020. Br J Dermatol. 2021;184:401-4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Marking a surgical margin for excision of a keratinocyte cancer. Aust J Gen Pract. 2021;50:385-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. . NG14: Skin cancer: Assessment and management. . Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng14/chapter/Recommendations#assessing-melanoma [Last accessed on 2025 Jan 21]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , . How to minimize the pain of local anesthetic injection for wide awake surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021;9:e3730.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , . The versatile skin hook. Arch Dermatol. 1962;86:343-4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , . Scar orientation: Principles in plastic surgery. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2020;13:152-3.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , . Mohs micrographic surgery versus surgical excision for periocular basal cell carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014:CD007041.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , . Mohs surgery: Indications, technique, and outcomes. Dermatol Clin. 2019;37:345-55.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections