Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
Consensus Statement
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Image
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Point of View
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Authors’ Reply
BRIDGING THE GAP
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
BRIEF REPORT
Case Report
Case Reports
Case Series
CME
CME ARTICLE
CME articles - Practice points
COMMENTARY
CONFERENCE REPORT
Consensus Statement
CONTROVERSY
Correspondence
Correspondences
CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
DRUG REVIEW
E-CHAT
Editorial
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
ERRATUM
ETHICAL HOTLINE
ETHICS
Field: Evolution of dermatologic surgergy
FOCUS
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATO SURGERY
From the Editor's Desk
FROM THE LITERATURE
GUEST EDITORIAL
Guidelines
Image
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatosurgery
INNOVATION
Innovations
INVITED COMMENTARY
JCAS Symposium
LETTER
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
LETTERS
Message from the President
NEW HORIZON
Original Article
Point of View
Practice Point
Practice Points
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH
QUIZ
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Resident’s Page
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Spot the Diagnosis [Quiz]
STUDY
SURGICAL PEARL
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium—Lasers
Symposium: Hair in Dermatology
Symposium: Lasers Review Article
View Point
VIEWPOINT
VIEWPOINTS
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Correspondence
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/jcas_12_24

In vivo dermabrasion for de-epithelialization of autologous composite fat and dermal micrograft for treatment of small localized depressed scars

Department of Dermatology and Venereology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

*Corresponding author: Somesh Gupta, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. someshgupta@aiims.edu

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Taneja N, Gupta S. In vivo dermabrasion for de-epithelialization of autologous composite fat and dermal micrograft for treatment of small localized depressed scars. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. doi: 10.25259/jcas_12_24

Dear Editor,

The available therapeutic options for the correction of volume loss in localized depressed scars include synthetic fillers, autologous fat, and cultured fibroblasts. Their use is limited by the temporary effect, foreign body reaction, and/or high cost.1 De-epithelialized macrografts and micrografts have been used to fill these defects.1 The de-epithelialization is done using a sharp dissection after obtaining the graft, which is technically challenging, less precise, and often leads to loss of the dermal tissue.2

We propose harvesting composite dermal and fat micrografts from the dermabraded donor site, creating a micrograft suspension, and filling small localized depressed scars. The procedure is carried out under topical anesthesia with eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA®) (lignocaine + prilocaine) on the recipient site and infiltration anesthesia at the donor site (upper thigh). The donor epidermis is removed using a motorized dermabrader fitted with a diamond burr. Then, multiple punch biopsies (1.5 mm–2 mm) are obtained [Figure 1a and b]. Deep biopsies containing both dermis and subcutaneous fat are collected in a sterile petri dish and minced mechanically using a surgical blade to make a uniform suspension [Figure 1c]. There is no storage or conditioning media required during the mincing and preparation of suspension. The suspension is transferred to a 1 mL syringe which is then injected into the defect through an 18G needle after doing subcision with the same needle [Figure 1d]. Due to the subsequent decrease in graft size after implantation over a few months, overcorrection of up to 20–30% is recommended to overcome the loss in filling volume. Then, the entry point of the needle on the recipient area is sealed with a Steri-Strip.

(a) De-epithelized area done with motorized dermabrader; (b) multiple closely-spaced 1.5 mm punch biopsies taken from de-epithelized area; (c) the biopsies containing dermis and fat are minced and prepared into a suspension in a petri dish; and (d) the suspension is transferred into 1 ml syringe attached to an 18 G needle, for injecting.
Figure 1:
(a) De-epithelized area done with motorized dermabrader; (b) multiple closely-spaced 1.5 mm punch biopsies taken from de-epithelized area; (c) the biopsies containing dermis and fat are minced and prepared into a suspension in a petri dish; and (d) the suspension is transferred into 1 ml syringe attached to an 18 G needle, for injecting.

The patients have significant elevation in the depressed scars, and the facial volume loss is restored [Figure 2]. The donor site healed well in 1 week, with minimal scarring.

(a) Depressed acne scars; and (b) results after 3 months of injecting autologous composite fat and dermal micrograft.
Figure 2:
(a) Depressed acne scars; and (b) results after 3 months of injecting autologous composite fat and dermal micrograft.

The procedure of harvesting, preparing, and injecting the micrograft is easy, inexpensive, and effective for small, depressed scars.

Authors’ contributions

Both the authors were involved in concepts, design, definition of intellectual content, literature search, data acquisition, manuscript preparation, manuscript editing and manuscript review.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , . Autologous smashed dermal graft with epidermal re-closure: Modified technique for acne scars. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2016;9:258-62.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Deepithelialized flaps and grafts: Applications in dermatologic surgery. Cutis. 2018;101:213-6.
    [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
302

PDF downloads
0
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections